2000
DOI: 10.2749/101686600780481239
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wind-Tunnel Tests of a Bridge Model with Active Vibration Control

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
7
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
2
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although their width is 139 mm, the flaps on each side of the girder are only adding 2x120 mm to the extended bridge width B, since they are partially incorporated within the deck structure. This means that the effective flap width is 24% of the core deck width B (without flaps), a value that is comparable to the 25% of Hansen et al [5] and Kobayashi et al [3] as can be deduced from Table I.…”
Section: Flaps and Deck Anchoringsupporting
confidence: 78%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Although their width is 139 mm, the flaps on each side of the girder are only adding 2x120 mm to the extended bridge width B, since they are partially incorporated within the deck structure. This means that the effective flap width is 24% of the core deck width B (without flaps), a value that is comparable to the 25% of Hansen et al [5] and Kobayashi et al [3] as can be deduced from Table I.…”
Section: Flaps and Deck Anchoringsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Because of the relatively simple structure, it is well suited for testing new concepts [9]. Furthermore, all the previous experimental works presented in Section I investigating bridge flutter control using flaps [2][3][4][5][6][7][8] have leveraged this type of set-up.…”
Section: Experimental Set-upmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…1. Moreover, Hansen et al [4,5] flaps attached to the deck. More recently, Zhao et al [6] designed a controlled deck capable of suppressing flutter and buffeting.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%