2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jweia.2008.02.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wind tunnel tests and numerical simulations of wind pressures on buildings in staggered arrangement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
35
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is currently no consensus or recommendation on the 'best' two-equation model for calculating the wind pressure on buildings, except that the standard k-ε model is not suitable since it cannot reproduce the separation and reverse flow at the top of a building due to the overestimation of turbulence energy k at the impinging region of the building wall. To overcome this drawback, some authors have used revised k-ε models, such as the MMK model, the Durbin model, the Kato-Launder modification, the RNG k-ε model (Zhang and Gu, 2008), the realizable k-ε model (Montazeri and Blocken, 2013) or k-ω based models such as the SST model. Some authors have also made a model comparison (Kim and Patel, 2000;Endo et al, 2005;Guha et al, 2009;Tominaga and Stathopoulos, 2009;Ramponi and Blocken, 2012;Ai et al, 2013).…”
Section: Flow and Turbulence Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There is currently no consensus or recommendation on the 'best' two-equation model for calculating the wind pressure on buildings, except that the standard k-ε model is not suitable since it cannot reproduce the separation and reverse flow at the top of a building due to the overestimation of turbulence energy k at the impinging region of the building wall. To overcome this drawback, some authors have used revised k-ε models, such as the MMK model, the Durbin model, the Kato-Launder modification, the RNG k-ε model (Zhang and Gu, 2008), the realizable k-ε model (Montazeri and Blocken, 2013) or k-ω based models such as the SST model. Some authors have also made a model comparison (Kim and Patel, 2000;Endo et al, 2005;Guha et al, 2009;Tominaga and Stathopoulos, 2009;Ramponi and Blocken, 2012;Ai et al, 2013).…”
Section: Flow and Turbulence Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Concerning the effect of wind on the surfaces of buildings, many studies have dealt with buildings whose geometry is either relatively simple (Baskaran and Stathopoulos, 1992;Murakami et al, 1992;ASHRAE, 2001;Endo et al, 2005;Zhang and Gu, 2008;Guha et al, 2009;Tominaga and Stathopoulos, 2009;Kim and Kanda, 2010) or very specific (Suh et al, 1997;Meroney, 2002;Ai et al, 2013;Montazeri and Blocken, 2013). More paper references can also be found in Blocken (2014), which presents a review of the 50 past years of Computational Wind Engineering, including wind effects on 3D buildings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of scaled models has been widely justified for validations made over field experiences in real environments [12][13][14] and CFD simulation enables the study of the air behaviour over ideal models so as to obtain a global vision of the relationship between the air and the built volumes [13,[15][16][17].…”
Section: Cfd Model Configurationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Especially, great efforts have been made on interference effects of wind loads among grouped tall buildings [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25]. Furthermore, field measurements of wind characteristics and building responses [26], local wind pressure characteristics of tall buildings and design method of cladding [18,27], wind-rain loads on tall buildings and towers [28], numerical simulation of wind loads on tall buildings [29][30][31][32][33][34], comparison study on wind effects and earthquake effects on tall buildings with consideration of soil-structure interaction [35,36], wind-induced fatigue life reliability of complicated steel structures [37] and control methods of wind-induced vibration of tall buildings and structures with consideration of aeroelastic effects [38][39][40][41][42][43] were also paid attention to. Some of the above aspects are introduced in this paper.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%