1984
DOI: 10.1016/0141-0296(84)90036-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wind tunnel modelling as a means of predicting the response of chimmeys to vortex shedding

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
4
0

Year Published

1984
1984
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
2
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It can be seen that these two experimental values extend the range of the turbulence parameter Ta above the full scale results, and that the values of C l follow the trend established by the full scale results. Estimates of sectional coefficients of lift C l and turbulence parameter Ta = Iu (L x u /D) −1/3 presented by Vickery and Daly (1984), together with values obtained at the upper end of the Reynolds number range (Re ≈ 5 × 10 5 ) in the present experiments.…”
Section: Ruscheweyhsupporting
confidence: 75%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…It can be seen that these two experimental values extend the range of the turbulence parameter Ta above the full scale results, and that the values of C l follow the trend established by the full scale results. Estimates of sectional coefficients of lift C l and turbulence parameter Ta = Iu (L x u /D) −1/3 presented by Vickery and Daly (1984), together with values obtained at the upper end of the Reynolds number range (Re ≈ 5 × 10 5 ) in the present experiments.…”
Section: Ruscheweyhsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…There was substantial, but not dominant, energy at low frequencies, due to the buffeting effects of turbulence. Sanada & Nakamura (1983) and Sanada, Suzuki & Matsumoto (1992) published results measured on a 200 m high reinforced concrete stack; the readings were obtained from pressure tappings installed at an elevation of 140 m where the diameter was 15 m. The results have also been reproduced and discussed by Vickery & Daly (1984) and Vickery (1991). The surface roughness for this structure is not known, but is likely to be comparable to that for the Hamburg television tower.…”
Section: Flow Configuration 4 I U = 18%mentioning
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…VIV models are numerous and codified methods can be found in many standards but their ability to capture the VIV amplitude response at super-critical Reynolds numbers and with real atmospheric boundary layers needs validation. Wind tunnels are also important in response prediction though the scaled models can cause cross-wind loads to be highly overestimated [29]. A method for overcoming the scaling effect is to artificially increase the Reynolds number by adding surface roughness to the cylinder's surface [20,21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%