1996
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1096-9837(199603)21:3<205::aid-esp505>3.0.co;2-t
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wind Tunnel Experiments of Aeolian Dust Deposition Along Ranges of Hills

DIRK GOOSSENS

Abstract: Wind tunnel experiments of aeolian dust deposition on topographic scale models of ranges of hills were conducted. Different hill sizes and hill spacings were used, and comparisons with the deposition patterns over single, isolated hills were made. Dust profiles over ranges of hills differ from the profiles over identical, but isolated hills. On isolated hills the sedimentation maximum on the windward hillslope is always single and located on the concave part of the slope. In the case of ranges of hills, the ma… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
12
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
2
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The particle mass flux reflects some of the features of the flow field. As experimentally observed by Goossens (), the horizontal particle supply to the valleys is almost negligible (Figure b) as most of the mass flux is provided vertically by the flow downdrafts (Figure c).…”
Section: Model Testingsupporting
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The particle mass flux reflects some of the features of the flow field. As experimentally observed by Goossens (), the horizontal particle supply to the valleys is almost negligible (Figure b) as most of the mass flux is provided vertically by the flow downdrafts (Figure c).…”
Section: Model Testingsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…We validate our model against wind tunnel measurements of dust deposition onto isolated hills (Goossens, ) and sequential hills (Goossens, ). These experimental studies provide us with detailed information on flow field, sediment, and deposition patterns and are thus ideal test cases for the validation of our model.…”
Section: Model Testingmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The selection of an appropriate reference site in a wind erosion/dust deposition area was based on fluid dynamical principles as shown in previous wind tunnel and field studies by Goossens (1988Goossens ( , 1996Goossens ( , 2006. Summit positions have the lowest dust depositions because of the local increase of the wind speed.…”
Section: Reference Sitementioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand higher wind speed promotes wind erosion, so the site should also be characterized by a dense vegetation or litter cover to prevent soil losses. In complex terrain a downwind hill is influenced by a dust-shadow effect by an upwind hill and almost free of dust deposition (Goossens 1996), so this aspect should also be considered, if possible. Last but not least the site should be plane or only slightly sloped to exclude additional influences of water erosion.…”
Section: Reference Sitementioning
confidence: 99%
“…those with bodies greater than a 4 or 5 mm 2 surface area, like mountain pine beetle) are less likely to be carried over top of a barrier to enter circulating leeward eddies because of their great inertia (Lewis and Dibley 1970). Hills that are relatively close to each other will also increase the amount of deposition on the windward slope of consecutive hills (Goossens 1996). The topography in the western portion of the Peace River region is characterized by consecutive ridges and valleys, causing ridgelines downwind to sustain more insect deposition on windward, southwestern slopes.…”
Section: 5: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%