“…Eto et al (2019) conducted a wind-tunnel experiment of UB at 0.14% free-stream velocity on an airfoil using air supply from an external compressor, i.e., active UB, and confirmed 20%-40% local friction drag reduction through a hot-wire measurement of velocity profiles and a quantitative assessment taking into account the pressure gradient. Although UB is generally known as an active control, Eto et al (2017) also attempted a passive blowing, which is driven by the pressure difference on a wing surface between suction and blowing region. They did not achieve an effective passive blowing due to the pressure loss mainly caused by the tubes and internal structure; however, they confirmed the feasibility of passive blowing and suggested structure of an airfoil to attain passive blowing with low pressure loss.…”
Friction drag reduction effect of a passive blowing on a Clark-Y airfoil is investigated. Uniform blowing, conducted in a wall-normal direction on a relatively wide surface, is generally known as an active control method for reduction of turbulent skin friction drag. In the present study, uniform blowing is passively driven by the pressure difference on a wing surface between suction and blowing regions. The suction and the blowing regions are respectively set around the leading edge and the rear part of the upper surface of the Clark-Y airfoil in order to ensure a sufficient pressure difference for passive blowing. The Reynolds number based on the chord length is 0.65×10 6 and 1.55×10 6. The angle of attack is set to 0 • and 6 •. The mean streamwise velocity profiles on the blowing region and the downstream, measured by a traversed hot-wire anemometry, are observed to shift away from the wall by passive blowing. This behavior qualitatively suggests reduction of local skin friction on the wing surface. A quantitative assessment of the friction drag is performed using the law of the wall accounting for pressure gradients (Nickels, 2004), coupled with a modified Stevenson's law (Vigdorovich, 2016) to account for the weak blowing. From this assessment, the local friction drag reduction effect of passive blowing is estimated to reach 4% − 23%.
“…Eto et al (2019) conducted a wind-tunnel experiment of UB at 0.14% free-stream velocity on an airfoil using air supply from an external compressor, i.e., active UB, and confirmed 20%-40% local friction drag reduction through a hot-wire measurement of velocity profiles and a quantitative assessment taking into account the pressure gradient. Although UB is generally known as an active control, Eto et al (2017) also attempted a passive blowing, which is driven by the pressure difference on a wing surface between suction and blowing region. They did not achieve an effective passive blowing due to the pressure loss mainly caused by the tubes and internal structure; however, they confirmed the feasibility of passive blowing and suggested structure of an airfoil to attain passive blowing with low pressure loss.…”
Friction drag reduction effect of a passive blowing on a Clark-Y airfoil is investigated. Uniform blowing, conducted in a wall-normal direction on a relatively wide surface, is generally known as an active control method for reduction of turbulent skin friction drag. In the present study, uniform blowing is passively driven by the pressure difference on a wing surface between suction and blowing regions. The suction and the blowing regions are respectively set around the leading edge and the rear part of the upper surface of the Clark-Y airfoil in order to ensure a sufficient pressure difference for passive blowing. The Reynolds number based on the chord length is 0.65×10 6 and 1.55×10 6. The angle of attack is set to 0 • and 6 •. The mean streamwise velocity profiles on the blowing region and the downstream, measured by a traversed hot-wire anemometry, are observed to shift away from the wall by passive blowing. This behavior qualitatively suggests reduction of local skin friction on the wing surface. A quantitative assessment of the friction drag is performed using the law of the wall accounting for pressure gradients (Nickels, 2004), coupled with a modified Stevenson's law (Vigdorovich, 2016) to account for the weak blowing. From this assessment, the local friction drag reduction effect of passive blowing is estimated to reach 4% − 23%.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.