2021
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac0cf7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wind-powered Ultraluminous X-ray Sources

Abstract: Although ultraluminous X-ray sources (ULX) are important for astrophysics because of their extreme apparent super-Eddington luminosities, their nature is still poorly known. Theoretical and observational studies suggest that ULXs could be a diversified group of objects that are composed of low-mass X-ray binaries, high-mass X-ray binaries and marginally also systems containing intermediate-mass black holes. Observational data on the ULX donors could significantly boost our understanding of these systems, but o… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We make the SED ULX models at each metallicity available as part of this work (Section 5.4), noting they represent only the accretion flow and therefore do not account for any emission related to the putative donor star. We have implemented the SED ULX without selecting a unique donor star, in part because the distribution of such sources for ULXs, though the subject of intense study, is still not well constrained theoretically or observationally (e.g., Liu et al 2004;Copperwheat et al 2005;Motch et al 2011;Tao et al 2011;Grisé et al 2012;Soria et al 2012;Gladstone et al 2013;Heida et al 2014Heida et al , 2016Heida et al , 2019aHeida et al , 2019bWiktorowicz et al 2017Wiktorowicz et al , 2021Lau et al 2019). Identifying unique optical, UV, or IR counterparts at the extragalactic distances to most ULXs remains challenging.…”
Section: Parameterization Of Sed Shapementioning
confidence: 99%
“…We make the SED ULX models at each metallicity available as part of this work (Section 5.4), noting they represent only the accretion flow and therefore do not account for any emission related to the putative donor star. We have implemented the SED ULX without selecting a unique donor star, in part because the distribution of such sources for ULXs, though the subject of intense study, is still not well constrained theoretically or observationally (e.g., Liu et al 2004;Copperwheat et al 2005;Motch et al 2011;Tao et al 2011;Grisé et al 2012;Soria et al 2012;Gladstone et al 2013;Heida et al 2014Heida et al , 2016Heida et al , 2019aHeida et al , 2019bWiktorowicz et al 2017Wiktorowicz et al , 2021Lau et al 2019). Identifying unique optical, UV, or IR counterparts at the extragalactic distances to most ULXs remains challenging.…”
Section: Parameterization Of Sed Shapementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Typical ULXs have X-ray luminosities in excess of 10 39 erg s −1 (Swartz et al 2004;Walton et al 2011). Although the ULXs are believed to be powered mostly by Roche lobe overflow (Karino 2018;El Mellah et al 2019), the wind accretion remains a viable option at least for some of these sources (Miller et al 2014;Wiktorowicz et al 2021).…”
Section: Implications For Ulxsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Up to the accepted normalization, the total number of ULX in our calculations (see Fig. In a recent paper by Wiktorowicz et al (2021), accretion from the stellar wind was considered. In this paper, the interpretation of Bondi-Hoyle-Littleton accretion for elliptical orbits is, however, significantly different from that in our study.…”
Section: Comparison To Other Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%