2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jweia.2013.10.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wind forces on single and shielded angle members in lattice structures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…and deck furniture (handrails, wind shields, etc.) (BS 5400, 2000; GB50009, 2012; JTG/T D60-01-2004, 2004) which has been widely used in bridge engineering; (3) A local approach to calculate aerodynamic forces on each member and corrected by taking into account the effects of shielding and angle of attack (Prud’homme et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…and deck furniture (handrails, wind shields, etc.) (BS 5400, 2000; GB50009, 2012; JTG/T D60-01-2004, 2004) which has been widely used in bridge engineering; (3) A local approach to calculate aerodynamic forces on each member and corrected by taking into account the effects of shielding and angle of attack (Prud’homme et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The influences of other important factors, such as wind angle of attack, truss topology, and aspect ratio (width to height ratio), are usually ignored. Finally, for the local method proposed by Prud’homme et al (2014), though taking into consideration the issues of wind angle of attack, shielding effect, and aspect ratio, it is still in its initial stage and needs further development to adequately address the interference effects from steel angle members and deck constructions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These tests are the base of the present design codes. For steel latticed structures, there are two main methods (Prud’homme et al, 2014): (1) a global method in which the wind forces are evaluated directly on a whole truss or part of a truss and (2) a local method in which the wind forces are evaluated on each member separately. The first method has been adopted by most codes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reynolds number mismatches between the model-scale section tests and the prototype tests had a small influence on both the individual member drag forces and the overall group effect. Prud’homme et al (2014) evaluated the aerodynamic loads on simplified latticed structures by taking into account the force on each individual member and the effect of Reynolds number, edge shape, and thickness ratio in smooth and turbulent flows. The results showed that Reynolds numbers between 14,000 and 38,100 have a negligible effect on drag coefficients, and turbulence generally reduces the drag coefficients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But for the purpose of introducing a practicable method to simulate the vibrations under skew winds, using global coefficients would be an expedient effective to obtain general features of dynamic responses. More precise alternative, of course, is to measure the dynamic coefficients of every segment, or to establish the wind force model for shielded members(Prud'homme et al, 2014).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%