2003
DOI: 10.1006/jare.2002.1085
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wind erosion from military training lands in the Mojave Desert, California, U.S.A.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Engelstaedter and Washington (2007) showed with satellite data that gustiness is better correlated with dust emissions than average wind speed in global ''hotspots'', and our study provides some support for this observation. Previous studies have shown that extreme wind events account for a large proportion of total dust emission over a longer measurement period (e.g., Holcombe et al, 1987;Stout, 2001;van Donk et al, 2003). That the correlations we measured are not significantly improved for hours above threshold vs. peak gust vs. average wind speed may be caused by the reduced efficiency of the dust traps at higher wind speeds (Goossens, 2007(Goossens, , 2010.…”
Section: Regional Contrasts In Seasonal Climate and Dust Fluxmentioning
confidence: 47%
“…Engelstaedter and Washington (2007) showed with satellite data that gustiness is better correlated with dust emissions than average wind speed in global ''hotspots'', and our study provides some support for this observation. Previous studies have shown that extreme wind events account for a large proportion of total dust emission over a longer measurement period (e.g., Holcombe et al, 1987;Stout, 2001;van Donk et al, 2003). That the correlations we measured are not significantly improved for hours above threshold vs. peak gust vs. average wind speed may be caused by the reduced efficiency of the dust traps at higher wind speeds (Goossens, 2007(Goossens, , 2010.…”
Section: Regional Contrasts In Seasonal Climate and Dust Fluxmentioning
confidence: 47%
“…4). Mean flux values were not integrated to estimate sediment mass transport values for the June 10 and August 17 collection dates at the unburned sites, because the flux data did not fit the powerof-height function required for the calculation (Van Donk et al, 2003). Unburned site mean flux values for the July 21 collection date fit a power function with a moderate correlation (R 2 ¼ 0.7) and the estimated sediment mass transport value was 0.08 kg m À1 .…”
Section: Spring/summermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mean (±SE) sediment flux (kg m −2 d −1 ) from BSNE collectors located at different heights (0.05, 0.10, 0.20, 0.55 and 1.0 m) in the recently burned and adjacent unburned area. Mean sediment flux was plotted as a function of sample height for each sampling date, and a power model was fitted to each plot to calculate sediment discharge (kg m −1 d −1 ) as described in Van Donk et al (2003).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rates of sediment transport were calculated as described in Van Donk et al (2003). Briefly, aeolian sediment flux (kg m −2 d −1 ) for each tower was first calculated for each sediment sampling interval and height as: We omitted sediment discharge estimates for which the r 2 value of the power model was less than 0.80 from further statistical analyses, so sample size in the burned and unburned area ranged between three and five height-integrated flux measurements for each time period.…”
Section: Sediment Transport Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%