2010
DOI: 10.1029/2009ja014754
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wind and temperature effects on thermosphere mass density response to the November 2004 geomagnetic storm

Abstract: [1] A unique conjunction of the Thermosphere Ionosphere Mesosphere Energetics and Dynamics (TIMED) and the Challenging Minisatellite Payload (CHAMP) satellites provided simultaneous columnar neutral composition, SO/N 2 , and thermosphere density observations, enabling a novel study of thermospheric response to the 7-9 November 2004 geomagnetic storm. Both SO/N 2 and mass density showed profound response to this severe geomagnetic storm, but their latitudinal and temporal structures differed markedly. In partic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
128
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(133 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
5
128
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At a given altitude well above the heating region, the first effect always causes a mass density enhancement, while the second one may cause a density reduction due to a smaller scale height of the heavier particles. Both increases and decreases have been observed over active regions (Prölss, 1982;Prölss et al, 1988;Lei et al, 2010). This competition of effects may also explain the lack of density enhancement reflected by the green curve in the upper right frame of Fig.…”
Section: Thermospheric Mass Density Effectsmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…At a given altitude well above the heating region, the first effect always causes a mass density enhancement, while the second one may cause a density reduction due to a smaller scale height of the heavier particles. Both increases and decreases have been observed over active regions (Prölss, 1982;Prölss et al, 1988;Lei et al, 2010). This competition of effects may also explain the lack of density enhancement reflected by the green curve in the upper right frame of Fig.…”
Section: Thermospheric Mass Density Effectsmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Here we would like to repeat the important parts only briefly: the density measurements at mid and low latitudes (between ±60 • MLat) are averaged for each CHAMP/GRACE orbit; high latitude regions are excluded because the density here responds to heating and composition change during magnetic storms (e.g. Lei et al, 2010a). E m is integrated over a period of about 3 h. After this preconditioning E m is termed E m , which shows better correlation with ρ avg .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The high latitude area is omitted because during storm-time the heating in this area causes thermal expansion and thermospheric composition change. Therefore, at high latitude regions we may find density enhancements or depletions in response to Joule heating (e.g., Lei et al, 2010).…”
Section: Density Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%