2018
DOI: 10.1007/s10694-018-0749-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wind and Fire Coupled Modelling—Part II: Good Practice Guidelines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 148 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As there are no guidelines for this particular use of numerical modelling, we recommend following the recommendations of OECD [26]. Some useful considerations on CFD modelling in fire safety engineering may be also found in [47].…”
Section: The Results For Mixtures With a Small Value Of ∆ρmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As there are no guidelines for this particular use of numerical modelling, we recommend following the recommendations of OECD [26]. Some useful considerations on CFD modelling in fire safety engineering may be also found in [47].…”
Section: The Results For Mixtures With a Small Value Of ∆ρmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The comparisons detailed in this analysis show the potential for the presented model to estimate multi-modal wind direction distributions representing complicated wind behaviours, which include re-circulation regions on leeward slopes. The expression of the wind as a boundary condition in modelling is an accomplishment of the meso-scale atmospheric phenomena via an Atmospheric Boundary Layer simulation in CFD [33]. This implementation typically needs to have three terms specified, including a vertical profile for average speed, the turbulence features and the upstream aerodynamic roughness length.…”
Section: Fire Modelling and Wind Interactionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A sample view of the numerical mesh in the vicinity of the ventilator (the area where sprinkler activation time was assessed) is shown in Figure 2. The mesh was created following the guidelines presented in [37] and was verified following a mesh sensitivity analysis. For this purpose, one case (fire scenario 2, closed vent) was simulated on three different models.…”
Section: Case Study-numerical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, increasing the mesh size to δx = 0.2 m resulted in significant differences in activation time for almost all of the scenarios. In consequence, the medium (δx = 0.1 m) mesh was chosen for the rest of The mesh was created following the guidelines presented in [37] and was verified following a mesh sensitivity analysis. For this purpose, one case (fire scenario 2, closed vent) was simulated on three different models.…”
Section: Case Study-numerical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%