2017
DOI: 10.15330/ms.49.1.29-51
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wiman's type inequality for multiple power series in the unbounded cylinder domain

Abstract: In this paper we prove some analogues of Wiman's inequality for analytic f (z) and random analytic functionsis a multiplicative system of random variables on the Steinhaus probability space, uniformly bounded by the number 1. In particular, we prove the following statements: For every δ > 0 there exist sets.hold for all r ∈ T \ E 1 and for all r ∈ T \ E 2 a.s. in t, respectively. Also sharpness of the obtained inequalities is proved.1. Introduction and the main result. Let f be an analytic function in the disc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In paper [25] some analogues of Wiman's inequality are proven for the analytic f (z) and random analytic f (z, t)…”
Section: Wiman's Type Inequality For Analytic Functions Of Several Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In paper [25] some analogues of Wiman's inequality are proven for the analytic f (z) and random analytic f (z, t)…”
Section: Wiman's Type Inequality For Analytic Functions Of Several Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proof of the main result uses the probabilistic reasoning from [17,18] (see also [20]), which has already become traditional in this topic, and differs from the proofs of similar statements in [25].…”
Section: Auxiliary Lemmasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…it is proved an analogue of the Wiman inequality for maximum modulus on bi-circle M (r, f ) = max{|f (z 1 , z 2 )| : |z 1 | = r 1 , |z 2 | = r 2 } and maximal term µ(r, f ) = max{|a n |r n : n ∈ Z 2 + }, r = (r 1 , r 2 ) ∈ R 2 + with 3/2 instead of 1/2 in (8). A. Schumitski ([8, 9]), P. Fenton ([10]), O. Skaskiv and O. Trakalo ([11]) and some others authors have improved Bitlyan and Goldberg's result as in the specification of inequality, and in the specification of describing exceptional set, and also established analogues Wiman's inequality for other classes analytic functions of several variables (see also[12]-[26]). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%