2014
DOI: 10.12988/ijma.2014.4232
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wiman's inequality for the Laplace integrals

Abstract: We find unimprovable conditions for the Laplace-Stieltjes type integrals under which the Wiman-type inequality holds.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Then we have that the mean Mξ = g ′ 1 (x) and the variance Dξ = g ′′ 1 (x), where g 1 (x) = ln g(x). By Bienayme-Chebyshev inequality we obtain (see also [4,8,9])…”
Section: Remarkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Then we have that the mean Mξ = g ′ 1 (x) and the variance Dξ = g ′′ 1 (x), where g 1 (x) = ln g(x). By Bienayme-Chebyshev inequality we obtain (see also [4,8,9])…”
Section: Remarkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proof of Lemma 1 is carried out by verbatim repetition of the arguments from article [8] (see also [4,7,9]). Indeed, denote Proof.…”
Section: Auxillary Propositionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A sharp Wiman's type inequality for integrals from the class I(ν) was obtained in [2], where I(ν) is the notation of the class of functions F (x) of the form (2). Formula (2) gives the notation of the Laplace-Stieltjes integral, where f (u) is a positive ν−measured function on R, ν -countable measure on σ-algebra B(R + ) of Borel's sets on R + , such that ν({x : 0 ≤ x ≤ b}) < +∞ for every b > 0. Let ν(E) = E ν(dx) be the ν−measure of a Borel's set E ⊂ R, ν(a, b] := ν((a, b]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…λ k ≡ k (k ≥ 0), condition (5) holds with = 1. Therefore, inequality (4) holds with p 1 = 1/2, i.e., we have the classical Wiman's inequality (see [5,6,7]).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here H(r) is an entire function of one variable, for which condition (8) of Theorem 1 holds. Now we need one result from [7,Theorem 1]. Let I(ν) be the class of the functions F : R → R + defined by the integral of the form…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%