2003
DOI: 10.1353/jhi.2004.0007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wilting Florists: The Turbulent Early Decades of the Societe Asiatique, 1822-1860

Abstract: In the early nineteenth century, France clearly dominated Oriental studies in Europe. A decline of this dominance began with the "Florist" controversy, a debate from 1825 to 1829 over the aims of Oriental scholarship. This clash of methods almost tore the Soci�t� Asiatique apart and succeeded in setting Orientalist scholars in France on an exacting, scientific course that eclipsed the Romantic, literary roots out of which their studies had sprung. Ironically, the adoption of this new agenda inhibited the furth… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The very fact of translation is a domesticating strategy, and if translations are to be divided into domesticating and foreignising translations, one might imagine that a translation aimed at the general public would lie closer to the 'domesticating' end of the spectrum. This certainly seems to have been the case in nineteenth-century France, where, as McGetchin argues, the increasing reluctance of Sanskrit scholars to provide domesticated translations conforming to local literary tastes contributed to the marginalisation of Oriental studies (McGetchin 2003). But I am not sure that this would necessarily be the case today.…”
Section: Choice Of Audiencementioning
confidence: 98%
“…The very fact of translation is a domesticating strategy, and if translations are to be divided into domesticating and foreignising translations, one might imagine that a translation aimed at the general public would lie closer to the 'domesticating' end of the spectrum. This certainly seems to have been the case in nineteenth-century France, where, as McGetchin argues, the increasing reluctance of Sanskrit scholars to provide domesticated translations conforming to local literary tastes contributed to the marginalisation of Oriental studies (McGetchin 2003). But I am not sure that this would necessarily be the case today.…”
Section: Choice Of Audiencementioning
confidence: 98%
“…In the 1820s and 1830s, the "Florist" controversy-which opposed scholars who cared about aesthetic taste in translation instead of scientific accuracy-represented the very turning point for Oriental studies, from which the German call for a strictly scientific method came to dominate European scholarship. On the parallel in French scholarship, see McGetchin 2003. studies in the biographies and scholarly (and political) trajectories of the Italian Indologists discussed further below.…”
Section: The Vedic and āRyan Past During The National Rebirth Of Unif...mentioning
confidence: 99%