1976
DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(197605)37:5<2557::aid-cncr2820370549>3.0.co;2-l
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wilms' tumor: Natural history and prognostic factors.A retrospective study of 248 cases treated at the institut Gustave-Roussy 1952–1967

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
12
0
4

Year Published

1976
1976
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(1 reference statement)
2
12
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…In our study, tumours were localized in the left kidney in 55% of patients and in 51.5 and 54.4% of Japanese and Egyptian patients, respectively; there was no statistically significant difference and this was similar to that in previous studies that reported that the left kidney was involved more frequently than the right kidney [10,[28][29][30][31][32].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…In our study, tumours were localized in the left kidney in 55% of patients and in 51.5 and 54.4% of Japanese and Egyptian patients, respectively; there was no statistically significant difference and this was similar to that in previous studies that reported that the left kidney was involved more frequently than the right kidney [10,[28][29][30][31][32].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The diagnostic error for Wilms' tumor was reported to be 5 to 9%. 6,7 More recently this has dropped to 1.6%, 8 probably reflecting the recent advances in the radiological techniques. Some authors have recommended preoperative radiotherapy or chemotherapy for all cases of Wilms' tumor.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In their case 1, 'histological study confirmed the diagnosis of Wilms' tumour', and in their case 2, 'histology of the renal mass showed an undifferentiated Wilms' tumour'. Lemerle et al (1976) analyse various histological features of Wilms' tumours but make no comment about the microscopic appearances of the tumours of the 8 % of their patients at risk who developed bone metastases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%