12Allelopathy (i.e. chemical interactions between plants) is known to affect individual performance, 13 community structure and plant invasions. Yet, a quantitative synthesis is lacking. We performed 14 a meta-analysis of 385 studies that measured allelopathic effects of one species (allelopathy plant) 15 on another species or itself (test plant). Overall, allelopathy reduced plant performance by 25%, 16 but the variation in allelopathy was high. Type of method affected allelopathic effect. Compared 17 to leachates, allelopathy was more negative when residues of allelopathy plants were applied, 18 and less negative when soil conditioned by allelopathy plants was applied. The negative effects 19 of allelopathy diminished with study duration, and increased with concentrations of leachates or 20 residues. Although allelopathy was not significantly related to life span, life form and 21 domestication of the interacting plants, it became more negative with increasing phylogenetic 22 distance. Moreover, native plants suffered more negative effects from leachates of naturalized 23 alien plants than of other native plants. Our synthesis reveals that allelopathy could contribute to 24 success of alien plants. The negative relationship between phylogenetic distance and allelopathy 25 indicates that allelopathy might drive coexistence of close-related species (i.e. convergence) or 26 dominance of single species. 27 28 Keywords: allelopathy, crop, invasive species, life history, meta-analysis, phylogeny, soil 29 microbes, succession 30 plants (see Table 1 for a summary of the major methods that have been used to test allelopathy). 54The differences in study design partly reflect the four pathways through which allelochemicals 55 are released into the environment, that is, leaching from plants by rain, decomposition of plant 56 residues (e.g. litter), exudation from roots and volatilization (Fig. 2; Rice 2 p309). However, 57 studies also differ with regard to the different life stages of plants (e.g. germination vs. growth) 58 and the duration of the experiment (Fig. S2). Disentangling the importance of the different 59 factors related to the study design can hardly be achieved in a single case study, but is feasible in 60 a meta-analysis. 61Variance in allelopathy can also arise from biological traits of plants. Several studies of 62 plant succession revealed that the effect of allelopathy may depend on life history. For example, 63Jackson and Willemsen 17 reported that ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia) and wild radish 64 (Raphanus raphanistrum), which are short-lived and early-successional species, cannot 65 reestablish on soils on which the long-lived and late-successional species Aster pilosus grew 66 previously. Besides life history, domestication may also matter as crop species appear to be more 67 sensitive to allelopathy than weeds 18 . From an evolutionary perspective, individuals of short-68 lived species are associated with other species for a shorter period than long-lived species are 19 . 69