2021
DOI: 10.3368/le.97.4.072820-0115r1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Willingness to Pay for Multi-peril Hazard Insurance

Abstract: Increasing the number of insured assets in high risk areas can help reduce the need for federal disaster aid and help communities rebuild quicker following a disaster event.Offering a bundled multi-peril homeo ner in rance prod c ma be one a o do hi .

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While there is a significant body of literature on past changes to insurance premiums, the literature on future changes to insurance premiums is limited (Bouwer 2013;Pastor-Paz et al 2020;Phelan 2011). Much of the existing literature focuses on questions of consumer willingness to pay for insurance rather than insurers' willingness to supply insurance (Booth et al 2022;Browne et al 2015;Dixon et al 2017;Landry et al 2021). In most locations, it seems that markets are not pricing the retreat of insurance as in many jurisdictions, governments increasingly are appearing willing to act as the insurer of last resort when insurance supply is disrupted following major catastrophes (Binskin et al 2020;Furukawa et al 2020;Jarzabkowski et al 2019;Kousky 2019;Kraehnert et al 2021;Lucas et al 2021;PRA 2015).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While there is a significant body of literature on past changes to insurance premiums, the literature on future changes to insurance premiums is limited (Bouwer 2013;Pastor-Paz et al 2020;Phelan 2011). Much of the existing literature focuses on questions of consumer willingness to pay for insurance rather than insurers' willingness to supply insurance (Booth et al 2022;Browne et al 2015;Dixon et al 2017;Landry et al 2021). In most locations, it seems that markets are not pricing the retreat of insurance as in many jurisdictions, governments increasingly are appearing willing to act as the insurer of last resort when insurance supply is disrupted following major catastrophes (Binskin et al 2020;Furukawa et al 2020;Jarzabkowski et al 2019;Kousky 2019;Kraehnert et al 2021;Lucas et al 2021;PRA 2015).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet, only about 30% of US households in FEMA-designated special flood hazard areas (SFHAs) have a flood insurance policy (Kousky, Kunreuther, et al, 2018). A number of explanations for this have been proposed, including moral hazard (Kousky, Michel-Kerjan, & Raschky, 2018;Landry, Turner, & Petrolia, 2021), affordability of premiums (Kousky & Kunreuther, 2014;Netusil et al, 2021), and the cognitive burden and hassle of obtaining additional insurance (Landry, Anderson, et al, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%