2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2013.04.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Willingness to Pay for Diagnostic Technologies: A Review of the Contingent Valuation Literature

Abstract: The contingent valuation literature in diagnostics has grown rapidly, and suggests that many respondents place considerable value on diagnostic information. There exists, however, great variation in studies with respect to the type of technologies and diseases assessed, respondent characteristics, and study methodology. The perceived value of diagnostic technologies is also influenced by the study design and elicitation methods.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
34
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
2
34
1
Order By: Relevance
“… 9 24 27 32–34 The literature also underlined a great variability regarding populations (patients, general population, family members and so on) and health conditions when measuring levels of interest 9 and estimating WTP values. 32 This point supports the relevance of conducting a study for BCST in the particular context of Québec. Moreover, while the literature shows the existence of an association between interest in and cost of genetic tests for cancer susceptibility, 27 35–38 there is no consensus on which one influences the other.…”
Section: Literature Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“… 9 24 27 32–34 The literature also underlined a great variability regarding populations (patients, general population, family members and so on) and health conditions when measuring levels of interest 9 and estimating WTP values. 32 This point supports the relevance of conducting a study for BCST in the particular context of Québec. Moreover, while the literature shows the existence of an association between interest in and cost of genetic tests for cancer susceptibility, 27 35–38 there is no consensus on which one influences the other.…”
Section: Literature Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 57%
“… 9 32 To deal with these issues, we identified a list of recurrent individual variables empirically tested in the context of cancer susceptibility testing. Inspired by the classifications of Sweeny et al 9 and Lin et al , 32 these variables were thereafter classified into three categories: demographic, medical and psychosocial (see online supplementary appendix 1 for the literature overview). Finally, previous study findings did not allow a detailed understanding of how preferences and WTP values vary according to individual factors.…”
Section: Literature Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Use of MRI resulted in overall savings per patient. Moreover, Lin et al demonstrated that people are willing to undergo diagnostic radiology exams—and are willing to pay more—to reduce unnecessary, invasive medical procedures and overall health costs [ 27 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contingent valuation has become widespread in the evaluation of health interventions (814). We provided separate measures of average WTP and price elasticity of demand by delivery model and respondent type, and we estimated the cost of providing the DPP under different delivery models.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%