2008
DOI: 10.1177/107327480801500408
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Willingness to Participate in Cancer Screenings: Blacks vs Whites vs Puerto Rican Hispanics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
(35 reference statements)
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sampling weights were produced because of the complex design of the CSQ Study. A more detailed explanation of the study design, as well as justifications of methodological decisions, is described elsewhere (Katz et al, 2008; Kressin et al, 2010). A total of 1,148 participants completed the telephone survey.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sampling weights were produced because of the complex design of the CSQ Study. A more detailed explanation of the study design, as well as justifications of methodological decisions, is described elsewhere (Katz et al, 2008; Kressin et al, 2010). A total of 1,148 participants completed the telephone survey.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We administered a questionnaire to all study participants, which contained all measures used in this analysis, and which has been fully described (as regards development, administration, and data analysis decisions) in our prior publications based upon this survey 34,35,38. The questionnaire was administered either in English or Spanish, at the preference of the respondent.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While 2 recent papers by our research group addressed this latter issue and reported that blacks and Hispanics, after adjusting only for demographic factors, were either as or more likely than whites to self-report willingness to have cancer screenings, and perceived a higher risk of “not getting a thorough cancer screening” than did whites, neither of those analyses delved into underlying reasons for those observed differences 34,35. Therefore, the purpose of this current analysis is to examine general willingness to engage in cancer screening, in the context of varied symptoms and screening settings, and among a diverse cohort from multiple geographic areas, with an emphasis on assessing the influence of race/ethnicity, relative to sociodemographic factors, to both positive and negative attitudes and beliefs about cancer screening on this willingness to utilize screening in general.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Forty households were selected as randomly as possible for the survey. Previous studies reported that a sample of 30 or 40 people is an acceptable number to gain valuable insights about patterns of tendency in a given population [15,20,21] using a questionnaire in the form of statements [15,20,22] or direct questions [15,16,22,23]. Prior the survey, a public announcement was made by the chief of the Yokoè Quarter in the community and at local churches to inform residents and ensure their consent and voluntary participation in the survey.…”
Section: Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%