2017
DOI: 10.1111/1468-5973.12197
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Willingness to click: Risk information seeking during imminent threats

Abstract: Short messaging systems have the potential to deliver targeted messages to individuals needing critical safety information. However, their limited content may provide insufficient life‐saving information. One solution is to include a hyperlink that allows message recipients access to a web page. Research has not examined whether at‐risk individuals are willing to use this strategy in time critical situations. Using constructs from the risk information seeking and processing model, this study investigates how i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our qualitative responses reflect the agreement previously observed in RQ1.1: Half of the participants agree with the guidelines as they are, while many also point out that these were not relevant for people who do not use smartphones or social media, or if there is no time or network for this in case of an emergency. These last two comments are especially similar to results by Sutton, Woods, and Vos (), who identified the time and effort invested into information search as well as the technological access to reliable information as hurdles to an effective crisis communication via social media or websites. Therefore, it is suggested to expand the scope and apply the guidelines to mass media as well.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Our qualitative responses reflect the agreement previously observed in RQ1.1: Half of the participants agree with the guidelines as they are, while many also point out that these were not relevant for people who do not use smartphones or social media, or if there is no time or network for this in case of an emergency. These last two comments are especially similar to results by Sutton, Woods, and Vos (), who identified the time and effort invested into information search as well as the technological access to reliable information as hurdles to an effective crisis communication via social media or websites. Therefore, it is suggested to expand the scope and apply the guidelines to mass media as well.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Efforts to understand information seeking behaviors frequently built on the Risk Information Seeking and Processing model (Yang, Aloe, & Feeley, 2014), which integrates messenger, message, and audience characteristics to predict information seeking behaviors. The last decade saw this model applied in many contexts, including air pollution in South Korea (Kim & Kim, 2019), crisis communication via social media (Sutton, Woods, & Vos, 2018), and the 2014 Ebola outbreak (Yang, 2019), suggesting the versatility of the framework. Furthermore, the model has recently been extended to consider not just different contexts but different behaviors such as public support for climate change mitigation policy .…”
Section: Audiencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This information is hazardous because it tends to mislead the public. This is because society tends to believe information from a legitimate institution (Seeger, 2020;Sutton et al, 2018).…”
Section: Covid-19 Information Search Trendmentioning
confidence: 99%