2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.07.046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Willingness of future A/H7N9 influenza vaccine uptake: A cross-sectional study of Hong Kong community

Abstract: We conducted a population telephone survey in Hong Kong during the second wave of influenza A/H7N9 outbreak in 2014. Among the respondents, 50.5% of the respondents would like to accept A/H7N9 vaccination in future. Respondents had poor knowledge of A/H7N9 influenza and vaccines. More than 60% of respondents mixed up seasonal influenza this year and A/H7N9 influenza. Results show that socio-demographic factors were all independent of the vaccine uptake willingness while anxiety level and vaccine history were t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
62
4

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
6
62
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Our estimate was comparable to that of Hong Kong during the epidemic of H7N9 (50.5%) [13]. However, previous studies have shown that residents' willingness of future H7N9 influenza vaccine uptake varied across different regions and sub-populations: 50.5% among the general population of Hong Kong, 84% among the employees of food production of Guangzhou and 42.2% among live poultry traders of Guangzhou, a city located in Southern China [13][14][15]. Our estimate during the epidemic of H7N9 was also consistent with some findings from a systematic review during the 2009 H1N1 pandemic [25] (56.1% in the United Kingdom [26], 64% in the United States [27] and 54.7% in Australia [28]).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Our estimate was comparable to that of Hong Kong during the epidemic of H7N9 (50.5%) [13]. However, previous studies have shown that residents' willingness of future H7N9 influenza vaccine uptake varied across different regions and sub-populations: 50.5% among the general population of Hong Kong, 84% among the employees of food production of Guangzhou and 42.2% among live poultry traders of Guangzhou, a city located in Southern China [13][14][15]. Our estimate during the epidemic of H7N9 was also consistent with some findings from a systematic review during the 2009 H1N1 pandemic [25] (56.1% in the United Kingdom [26], 64% in the United States [27] and 54.7% in Australia [28]).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…In this study, 59.5% of the general adult population who had heard of H7N9 would like to accept H7N9 vacci-nation in the future. Our estimate was comparable to that of Hong Kong during the epidemic of H7N9 (50.5%) [13]. However, previous studies have shown that residents' willingness of future H7N9 influenza vaccine uptake varied across different regions and sub-populations: 50.5% among the general population of Hong Kong, 84% among the employees of food production of Guangzhou and 42.2% among live poultry traders of Guangzhou, a city located in Southern China [13][14][15].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Stratified random sampling was used to ensure the demographic representation of the general population in Hong Kong in terms of age, gender, and district of residence. This data collection method has been used for other similar local studies on infectious diseases [30,31]. Most of the calls were made during evenings (6:30 pm to 10:00 pm) to avoid an under-representation of the working population.…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As an important public health problem, seasonal in uenza has been addressed with focus on a population's intention to receive future in uenza vaccine and associated uptake rates [7][8]; to investigate the knowledge, attitudes and practices of individuals regarding seasonal in uenza vaccination [9][10][11][12]; to focus on the economic impacts of seasonal in uenza, such as the estimation of the direct/indirect costs in relation to outpatient visits and hospitalisation [13]; and on the vaccine and vaccination administration costs [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%