2014
DOI: 10.1177/0160597614529114
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

William Worthy’s Concept of “Institutional Rape” Revisited

Abstract: This article examines the role of anchor institutions in the urban revitalization process. We use case study analysis to understand how concerns about residential displacement are addressed by anchor institutions in the urban planning process. This analysis is designed to build upon William Worthy's critique of anchor-based development during the 1960s and 1970s. Our analysis examines the degree to which his concept of ''institutional rape'' applies to contemporary urban revitalization efforts. The article foc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(23 reference statements)
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…New urban regimes have broader agendas beyond their place-based institutions and are linked with "campaigns to reorganize and privatize the public institutions in the neighborhoods that surround them" (Patterson and Silverman 2014, p. 8). Studies show how the regimes function in neighborhoods by focusing on residents' negotiations with hospital or university anchors (Gregory 2013;Salkin and Lavine 2008;Silverman, Lewis and Patterson 2014). Residents often perceive these institutions and associated funders as "elite actor[s]" with their own economic agenda (Horak et al 2015, p. 28; also see Ahn 2007;Baldwin 2021).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…New urban regimes have broader agendas beyond their place-based institutions and are linked with "campaigns to reorganize and privatize the public institutions in the neighborhoods that surround them" (Patterson and Silverman 2014, p. 8). Studies show how the regimes function in neighborhoods by focusing on residents' negotiations with hospital or university anchors (Gregory 2013;Salkin and Lavine 2008;Silverman, Lewis and Patterson 2014). Residents often perceive these institutions and associated funders as "elite actor[s]" with their own economic agenda (Horak et al 2015, p. 28; also see Ahn 2007;Baldwin 2021).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using difference-indifference modeling, Ehlenz illustrates how anchor efforts can stimulate physical revitalization without socioeconomic benefits (2018b). Other research highlights the transactional nature of anchor models, capturing shortfalls when neighborhood benefits are shoehorned into institutional strategy (Silverman, Lewis, & Patterson, 2014;Silverman, Taylor, Yin, Miller, & Buggs, 2019).…”
Section: Anchoring the Community?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The development of the Canalside area, the construction of a Buffalo-Niagara Medical Campus, and West Side neighborhood development were part of Buffalo’s comeback story (Buffalo Niagara Medical Campus, n.d. ; Silverman et al, 2014; Visit Buffalo Niagara, n.d. ; Western New York Regional Economic Development Council, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To address the decline in formal institutions, funding for the criminal justice and immigration systems increased. As a result, incarceration and deportation became solutions to government-sponsored social problems (Alexander, 2010;Wacquant, 2009) Silverman et al, 2014;Visit Buffalo Niagara, n.d.;Western New York Regional Economic Development Council, 2017). The ventures of the Grant-Lafayette Strip, located on the west side, were supported by Westminster Economic Development Initiative (WEDI).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%