2014
DOI: 10.1586/14737159.2014.897609
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Will droplet digital PCR become the test of choice for detecting and quantifying ocularChlamydia trachomatisinfection? Maybe

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it was demonstrated that the discrepant results occurred in a mathematically predictable manner related to the analyte concentration and that most PCR-based technology will share an absolute limit to the number of analyte copies per test that will be reproducibly detected. It was highlighted that in a traditional discrepant analysis the sensitivity of this ddPCR assay could have been as high as 98% [ 30 ] and we therefore believe the test was appropriate in this setting.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it was demonstrated that the discrepant results occurred in a mathematically predictable manner related to the analyte concentration and that most PCR-based technology will share an absolute limit to the number of analyte copies per test that will be reproducibly detected. It was highlighted that in a traditional discrepant analysis the sensitivity of this ddPCR assay could have been as high as 98% [ 30 ] and we therefore believe the test was appropriate in this setting.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are as yet no accepted guidelines as to what level of sensitivity or specificity is required of a serological test; thus we referred to a previously published template [18] and established three possible thresholds from the ROC curve: one maximising specificity, one with a sensitivity greater than 80% [18] and one optimising the balance between sensitivity and specificity, by maximising Youden’s J-index [41]. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous nucleic acid-amplification tests (NAATs) have been developed, including the adapted use of commercial kits originally designed for diagnosing genitourinary Ct infections [1216]. NAATs have been shown to be cost-effective in some settings [17] but concerns have been raised that the per-sample cost of NAATs can be too much for national eye health programmes in countries where trachoma remains a problem [18]. The cost of specialist devices and platforms for deploying NAATs can also be prohibitive.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its applications are diverse, ranging from clinical specialties such as oncology, for example for the genotyping and monitoring of lung cancer, an area with high research activity [4], [5], [6], organ transplantation [7], [8], [9], microbiology [10], [11], [12], virology [13], [14], [15] or non-invasive prenatal testing [16], [17], [18], [19], [20]; to environmental studies [21], [22], [23], or health and safety monitoring for food and feed products [24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%