2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.06.034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Will Biomarkers Save Prostate Cancer Screening?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
(8 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Radical prostatectomy and radiation therapy are treatments that offer high cure rates; however, it is estimated that over 1,055 men need to be screened and 37 cancers detected to prevent one prostate cancer death 11 years later . Recently, recommendations for screening have been narrowed , and active surveillance protocols are commonly recommended for men with low risk disease . Prognostic biomarkers are needed to aid in clinical decision making for these men to more accurately distinguish between low risk and moderate to high risk prostate cancer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Radical prostatectomy and radiation therapy are treatments that offer high cure rates; however, it is estimated that over 1,055 men need to be screened and 37 cancers detected to prevent one prostate cancer death 11 years later . Recently, recommendations for screening have been narrowed , and active surveillance protocols are commonly recommended for men with low risk disease . Prognostic biomarkers are needed to aid in clinical decision making for these men to more accurately distinguish between low risk and moderate to high risk prostate cancer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Definitive treatment with radical prostatectomy or radiation therapy are essentially curative, however, it is estimated that over 1,055 men need to be screened and 37 cancers detected to prevent one prostate cancer death 11 years later (Schröder et al, ). There is a need for improved biomarkers for detection of aggressive disease (Cooperberg, ), and selection of men who may benefit from active surveillance protocols (Dall'Era et al, ; Bangma et al, ). Nevertheless, prostate cancer (PCa) is the second leading cause of death among men in the United States (Cazares et al, ; Saron et al, ; Barlow and Shen, ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%