2013
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.f2363
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Will austerity cuts dismantle the Spanish healthcare system?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
121
0
7

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 158 publications
(132 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
121
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…According to Navarro 47 , the substantial cuts in public health are accelerating the growth of private spending, with further segmentation of the Spanish health system, including private healthcare for the wealthier social strata and a public system that treats lower-income strata. According to Legido-Quigley et al 48 , the current health system reform hides the underlying interest of siphoning public funds to the private sector.…”
Section: Spainmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Navarro 47 , the substantial cuts in public health are accelerating the growth of private spending, with further segmentation of the Spanish health system, including private healthcare for the wealthier social strata and a public system that treats lower-income strata. According to Legido-Quigley et al 48 , the current health system reform hides the underlying interest of siphoning public funds to the private sector.…”
Section: Spainmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, with observational data alone we cannot establish whether the cause of a deterioration in the population's health, if any, is attributable to markets or governments, and among the latter, whether to those responsible for health or to public policy in general and the welfare state in particular. In these troubled waters, cutbacks in public health spending in developed countries have been associated with increases in mortality [2], and many medical research publications have defended the assertion that "austerity kills" [3,4], an idea which has become established in many sectors of society, including healthcare personnel [5] and in electoral programs. During the crisis, the word austerity (i.e., sobriety, the absence of excess) acquired a pejorative connotation [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is a term sometimes used by proponents, but more often by opponents and commentators, to describe attempts to cut national debt in relation to Gross Domestic Product (GDP) by decreasing expenditure on welfare and public services whilst increasing some taxes in the wake of the 2008 crisis (Blyth 2013, Konzelmann 2014. Throughout the post-2008 period austerity has been critiqued on multiple grounds, including that it is not achieving its stated aims (Guajardo et al 2014); that it is a fundamentally flawed idea that will necessarily worsen the problems that it is supposed to solve (Konzelmann 2014); that it is having devastating effects on public health (Karanikolos et al 2013, Legido-Quigley et al 2013; that it entrenches gender inequalities and disproportionately affects already disadvantaged groups of women (Griffin 2015, Montgomerie andTepe-Belfrage 2016); and even that it constitutes the end of democratic capitalism because capitalism no longer provides enough for enough people to sustain it democratically (Schäfer and Streeck 2013, Streeck 2014. Political contestation of austerity has taken many forms in this period, including the 15M, or Indignados, protests in Spain in 2011 (Hughes 2011, Castañeda 2012; an increase in various forms of anti-austerity social movement activity across Europe (Della Porta 2015, Giugni and Grasso 2015, Bailey et al 2016Flesher Fominaya 2017, Hayes 2017; the rise of new anti-austerity parties in Greece and Spain (Kioupkiolis 2016, Ramiro andGomez 2016); and the relative success of the Labour Party on an anti-austerity platform in the 2017 UK General Election (Berry 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%