1999
DOI: 10.1890/1051-0761(1999)009[0001:wmiusn]2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wildlife Management in U.S. National Parks: Natural Regulation Revisited

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Often, wildlife defy boundaries and threaten human interests, revealing people's limited ability to keep "good" animals in and "bad" animals out (Naughton-Treves 1997). The permeability of garden boundaries also means that wildlife survival is affected by human activities outside the garden (Naughton- Treves et al 1998;Soukup et al 1999). For example, lemurs in Malagasy parks are provisioned by surrounding plantations during times of scarcity (Ganzhorn and Abraham 1991).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Often, wildlife defy boundaries and threaten human interests, revealing people's limited ability to keep "good" animals in and "bad" animals out (Naughton-Treves 1997). The permeability of garden boundaries also means that wildlife survival is affected by human activities outside the garden (Naughton- Treves et al 1998;Soukup et al 1999). For example, lemurs in Malagasy parks are provisioned by surrounding plantations during times of scarcity (Ganzhorn and Abraham 1991).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Natural regulation, the National Park Service policy for ungulate management, has been plagued with controversy since its inception. The conflict in Yellowstone's northern range, where large elk populations have had strong impacts on vegetation, has brought this controversy to the forefront of ecology (Soukup et al 1999) and park policy (NRC 2002). Ultimately, conflict around aspen decline has generated a timely question about protected area management: Can we maintain complex ecological systems and ecological processes in the face of increasing human influence on parks and protected areas?…”
Section: The Outcome Of Inadequate Knowledge On Management Practicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the 1950s and 1960s, public outcry over ungulate reductions by park service agents led to the more publicly appealing and politically feasible alternative of natural regulation (Soukup et al 1999). Since the late 1960s, national park management has followed the natural regulation paradigm.…”
Section: The Outcome Of Inadequate Knowledge On Management Practicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…United States National Park Service (NPS) policy calls for minimizing human impacts on native plants, animals, populations, communities, ecosystems, and the processes that sustain them (NPS 1988). Included in this is the possibility for elimination of human factors that disrupt the natural community (Soukup et al 1999, Wright 1999. Anthropogenic disturbance factors, including vehicular traffic and wildlife viewing, can alter ungulate behavior, including limiting use of areas adjacent to the disturbance (Schultz and Bailey 1978, Czech 1991, Bender et al 1999 and increasing energy expenditures to avoid the disturbance (Cassirer et al 1992).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%