2017
DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2016.00122
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wildlife Interactions on Baited Places and Waterholes in a French Area Infected by Bovine Tuberculosis

Abstract: Interactions among wildlife species are major drivers for the transmission of multi-host pathogens, such as Mycobacterium bovis, which also affect livestock. Although France is officially free from bovine tuberculosis (bTB), some areas are still harboring infection in cattle and wildlife. We aimed at characterizing the visits of susceptible wild species (badger, red deer, and wild boar) at baited places and waterholes, considered as possible hotspots for contacts. We described the visits in terms of frequency,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
1
23
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The interface between cattle and foxes is most probably indirect as foxes are less often seen in direct contact with cattle than for instance with badgers [ 5 , 28 ]. Interspecific contacts can also occur between foxes and wild ungulates, especially on baited places and waterholes [ 29 ], and between foxes and badgers. Given that GPS location of badgers, wild boar or deer was not available, spatial location between them, and foxes was not possible in our study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interface between cattle and foxes is most probably indirect as foxes are less often seen in direct contact with cattle than for instance with badgers [ 5 , 28 ]. Interspecific contacts can also occur between foxes and wild ungulates, especially on baited places and waterholes [ 29 ], and between foxes and badgers. Given that GPS location of badgers, wild boar or deer was not available, spatial location between them, and foxes was not possible in our study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This could be due to the fact that interspecies interactions are not the only factor involved in the circulation and/or transmission of the bacterium. Actually, intraspecies interactions are often more common [46,47], but this is influenced by each epidemiological scenario. In our study area, most of the seropositive animals were detected in Gipuzkoa, a province where wild boars showed also the highest antibody titres.…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Maintaining low wild boar population density and restricting the use of supplementary feeding are efficient management tools for controlling the spread of pathogens in the wild boar population and decreasing the transmission risk (Boadella, 2015, Cano-Manuel et al, 2014, Madeira et al, 2017, Risco et al, 2014. These control strategies are especially important for controlling tuberculosis in countries where livestock are considered officially free of the tuberculosis in livestock (Payne et al, 2017).…”
Section: Control Of Foodborne Zoonotic Pathogens From Wild Boarsmentioning
confidence: 99%