Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2014
DOI: 10.3390/environments1010075
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wildlife Habitat Quality (Sward Structure and Ground Cover) Response of Mixed Native Warm-Season Grasses to Harvesting

Abstract: Agricultural intensification in America has replaced native warm-season grasses (NWSG) with introduced forages causing wildlife habitat loss and population declines for the northern bobwhite (Colinus virginianus) and similar ground-nesting birds. Reintroducing NWSGs onto managed grasslands to reverse grassland bird population declines lacks information about appropriate multipurpose management. Post-season nesting habitat quality of mixed NWSGs (indiangrass (IG, Sorghastrum nutans), big bluestem (BB, Andropogo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(26 reference statements)
2
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is likely that the dominant perennials in the more frequently harvested plots posed less obstruction to wind-borne seeds of BS and other perennials. This was consistent with earlier reported lack of differences in percentage of ground cover for grasses in the early-season growth, attributable to previous harvest intervals [34]. While the percentage of occurrence of IG in 2009 averaged about 25 below (p < 0.01) the control (62%), corresponding values for LB were about twice the 8% in the control.…”
Section: Proportions Of Perennial Grass Speciessupporting
confidence: 92%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…It is likely that the dominant perennials in the more frequently harvested plots posed less obstruction to wind-borne seeds of BS and other perennials. This was consistent with earlier reported lack of differences in percentage of ground cover for grasses in the early-season growth, attributable to previous harvest intervals [34]. While the percentage of occurrence of IG in 2009 averaged about 25 below (p < 0.01) the control (62%), corresponding values for LB were about twice the 8% in the control.…”
Section: Proportions Of Perennial Grass Speciessupporting
confidence: 92%
“…On the contrary, harvesting NWSGs appropriately stimulates vegetative growth through faster leaf blade expansion and axillary tiller development [40]. These results, like earlier reports on ground cover [34], suggest that harvesting regimes did not compromise subsequent early-season recovery. Therefore, forage harvesting alone may not decrease the proportions of these perennials in similar stands.…”
Section: Occurrence Of Perennial Grassessupporting
confidence: 74%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…So, incorporating NWSGs into the pasture systems will most likely improve summer forage production and availability in the region. For over a decade now, the mid-south and southeastern regions of the US have seen a growing interest in NWSGs mainly due to their superior summer forage potential (Angima et al, 2009;Temu et al, 2014a), wildlife habitat quality features (Temu et al, 2014b), and low-input demand. Of the NWSGs, big bluestem (BB, Andropogon gerardii Vitman), eastern gamagrass (GG, Tripsacum dactyloides L.), indiangrass [IG, Sorghastrum nutans (L.).…”
Section: Summer Forage Shortagesmentioning
confidence: 99%