1996
DOI: 10.1080/01431169608949100
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wildlife habitat analysis for ‘sambar’ (Cervus unicolor) in Kanha National Park using remote sensing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Conversely, for Sambar vegetation and terrain seem to be more suitable at XN compared to GM as described by Porwal et al (1996) and Varni et al (2012) while nothing is known about the reaction of sambar to human disturbance. At the NRWNNR, no open or half-open patches were found in the forest, which are often described as preferred ungulate habitat in Southeast Asia (Chodhury, 2002;Eisenberg and Seidensticker, 1976;Wani et al, 2012).…”
Section: Wildlife Species Abundancementioning
confidence: 91%
“…Conversely, for Sambar vegetation and terrain seem to be more suitable at XN compared to GM as described by Porwal et al (1996) and Varni et al (2012) while nothing is known about the reaction of sambar to human disturbance. At the NRWNNR, no open or half-open patches were found in the forest, which are often described as preferred ungulate habitat in Southeast Asia (Chodhury, 2002;Eisenberg and Seidensticker, 1976;Wani et al, 2012).…”
Section: Wildlife Species Abundancementioning
confidence: 91%
“…In 1986, Parihar et al evaluated habitat of Indian one-horned rhinoceros using remotely sensed data from 'LANDSAT', while Roy et al (1995) used this technology for habitat suitability analysis of Nemorhaedus goral. Similarly Porwal et al (1996) analyzed suitable habitat for sambar (Cervus unicolor) in Kanha National Park using RS data. The geospatial technology was widely used by Kushwaha and his colleagues for habitat suitability analysis of various wild animals.…”
Section: Use Of Geospatial Technology For Analysis Of Habitat Suitabimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, habitat development activities like canopy opening of plantation forests, controlled burning of grassland, removal of overwood from grassland and plantation of grasses also introduces dynamic changes in the extent of foraging areas of rhino. Considering the difficulties encountered while making manual assessment of the grassland and forest composition, on frequent basis, Remote sensing technology is found to be the most suitable tool for monitoring the habitat changes on real time basis [2,6,[9][10][11]12,13,15,18,19] . …”
Section: Objective Of the Study 1) To Prepare Vegetation Maps Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%