2020
DOI: 10.1177/1178622120950272
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wildfire Risk and Hazardous Fuel Reduction Treatments Along the US-Mexico Border: A Review of the Science (1986-2019)

Abstract: The ecosystems along the border between the United States and Mexico are at increasing risk to wildfire due to interactions among climate, land-use, and fuel loads. A wide range of fuel treatments have been implemented to mitigate wildfire and its threats to valued resources, yet we have little information about treatment effectiveness. To fill critical knowledge gaps, we reviewed wildfire risk and fuel treatment studies that were conducted near the US-Mexico border and published in the peer-reviewed literatur… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 193 publications
(151 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Alternatively, efforts could be made to influence biotic change with the goal of conserving important elements of current ecosystems that engender species and functional diversity across all taxa. Interventions such as strategic forest thinning, prescribed fire, protection of refugia for sensitive species, and restoration planting have shown promise in achieving these goals (Laushman et al., 2020; Strom & Fulé, 2007; Villarreal et al., 2020), but could be enhanced by more comprehensive scientific and social–ecological underpinnings (Coop et al., 2020; Falk et al., 2019; Gregg & Marshall, 2020; McWethy et al., 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternatively, efforts could be made to influence biotic change with the goal of conserving important elements of current ecosystems that engender species and functional diversity across all taxa. Interventions such as strategic forest thinning, prescribed fire, protection of refugia for sensitive species, and restoration planting have shown promise in achieving these goals (Laushman et al., 2020; Strom & Fulé, 2007; Villarreal et al., 2020), but could be enhanced by more comprehensive scientific and social–ecological underpinnings (Coop et al., 2020; Falk et al., 2019; Gregg & Marshall, 2020; McWethy et al., 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various local-scale fuels reduction treatments have been applied in parts of the borderlands region over the past 3 decades, but have shown mixed success in mitigating future wildfire risk and improving ecosystem resilience. 15 Lack of funding for large-scale fuels management and regulatory issues complicate implementation of landscape-scale, multijurisdictional fuels treatments in both Mexico and the United States. 16,17 The region has complex land ownership and land tenure patterns with varying land uses, management objectives, and human population densities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternatively, efforts could be made to direct future biotic change with the goal of conserving important elements of current ecosystems that engender species and functional diversity across all taxa. Interventions such as strategic forest thinning, prescribed fire, protection of refugia for sensitive species, and restoration planting have shown promise in achieving these goals (Strom & Fulé, 2007;Laushman et al, 2020;Villareal et al, 2020), but could be greatly enhanced by more comprehensive scientific and social-ecological underpinnings (Falk et al, 2019;McWethy et al, 2019;Coop et al, 2020). TABLE 1.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%