Wildfire bureaucracy: The affective dimensions of state engagement with Indigenous peoples in southeast Australia

Beggs, Lachlan; Dalley, Cameo

doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2023.103675

Cited by 4 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 39 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The complexity of political and administrative processes often translates into delays and hurdles in the effective implementation of conservation policies, where issues such as the slow approval of environmental legislation, lack of alignment among different government spheres, and interference of divergent interests can compromise agility and effectiveness in decision-making related to the conservation of Amazonian biodiversity (Marcovitch & Pinsky, 2020;Muller et al, 2021). This political bureaucracy not only delays crucial measures such as the allocation of financial resources but can also negatively impact the capacity to respond to emerging challenges such as deforestation and illegal resource exploitation (Beggs & Dalley, 2023).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Ahmed et al, 2022;Burgos- Ayala et al, 2022;Kokkoris et al, 2023;Tian et al, 2023;Zapata-Paulini et al, 2023) Political bureaucracyThe complexity and slowness of the political and administrative processes involved in decision-(Beggs & Dalley, 2023;Boehmer-Christiansen, 2002; a Gestão e Secretariado (GeSec), São Paulo, SP, v. XX, n. X, 202X, p. XX-XX.Validation of challenges inthe management of conservation units considering the context of the Amazon Region 8 Revista de Gestão e Secretariado -GeSec, V. 15, N. 4, P.01-22, 2024 São José dos Pinhais, Paraná, Brasil.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Validation of challenges in the management of conservation units considering the context of the Amazon Region

Albuquerque,

Paula,

Martins

et al. 2024

R. G. Secr.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study aimed to identify challenges in the management of conservation units through a literature review and validate them from the perspective of professionals in the field, considering the context of the Amazon Region. To achieve this, a literature review and a survey were conducted with professionals working in the field of conservation unit management. The collected data were analyzed using the Lawshe method. The results indicated that ten out of fifteen analyzed challenges were validated by the professionals. The validated challenges included: lack of financial resources, urbanization advancement, land conflicts, monitoring and enforcement, climate change, deforestation and illegal exploitation, lack of environmental education, political bureaucracy, conflicts with local communities, and corruption. The validated challenges mainly relate to management issues and the lack of more efficient governance strategies. The findings provide valuable insights for the promotion of sustainable conservation policies in the Amazon.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Validation of challenges in the management of conservation units considering the context of the Amazon Region

Albuquerque,

Paula,

Martins

et al. 2024

R. G. Secr.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…37 c. General Principles of Law Related to the Principle of Sovereignty 1) Self Determination Principle The judge's decision in the East Timor case strengthens the principle of selfdetermination as a source of international law relating to sovereignty in the territory, especially after the declaration of independence of a country in the context of breaking away from a colonial country. This principle has basically been practiced for a long time, even 33 Boermauna,Hukum Internasional (Pengertian Peranan Dan Fungsi Dalam Era Dinamika Global) from ancient times, 38 where naturally every group or nation wants to break away from colonialism 39 and wants to live freely in an independent context with their group or nation because they realize that they have the same interests. 40 Based on natural considerations for the independence of a nation, this principle is recognized in the International Convention on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) as part of Basic Human Rights.…”

Section: Exclusivity Rights Of State Within the Territorymentioning

confidence: 99%

Rethinking the Sovereignty Principle: Is it a Legal Provision or a Political Domain Nowadays?

Dewi Nurvianti,

Aris Irawan,

Fathurrahman

et al. 2023

Ilrej

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The relation of international community currently emphasize that soveregnty princple could not more decide as the main principle in managing a territory of state, even though sovereignty is the main requirement for a state to enforce its law and to do cooperation among entities in international relations. In order to find out the exact interpretation of sovereginty principle, this article used qualitative method. This study find out that sovereignty is recognized as one of the principles in recognizing a state. This term has a political nuance, because the aspect of recognition itself is not a legal aspect but a political one. Moreover, in several cases, even though a country had proclaimed its sovereignty, there are still opportunities for a part of the territory to become independent or even to be acquired by other countries. Thus, it seems that the principle of sovereignty has a tendency as part of politics. However, the principle of sovereignty remains a legal principle based on the provisions of international law, where each country has exclusive rights in every part of its territory, namely in land, air and sea. Currently, the concept of international law has expanded to the politic of international law study, which numerous aspects of law enforcement mingle with a country's policies that are synonymous with political aspects. Additionally, that the current principle of sovereignty should be completed with another legal principle in international law. Abstrak Hubungan masyarakat internasional saat ini menekankan bahwa prinsip kedaulatan tidak dapat lagi diputuskan sebagai prinsip utama dalam pengelolaan suatu wilayah negara, padahal kedaulatan merupakan syarat utama bagi suatu negara untuk menegakkan hukumnya dan untuk melakukan kerjasama antar entitas dalam hubungan internasional. Untuk mengetahui interpretasi yang tepat dari prinsip kedaulatan, artikel ini menggunakan metode kualitatif. Studi ini menemukan bahwa kedaulatan diakui sebagai salah satu prinsip dalam pengakuan suatu negara. Istilah ini bernuansa politis, karena aspek pengakuan itu sendiri bukanlah aspek hukum melainkan aspek politik. Apalagi, dalam beberapa kasus, meski suatu negara telah memproklamasikan kedaulatannya, masih ada peluang bagi sebagian wilayahnya untuk merdeka atau bahkan diakuisisi oleh negara lain. Dengan demikian, nampaknya prinsip kedaulatan memiliki kecenderungan sebagai bagian dari politik. Namun asas kedaulatan tetap merupakan asas hukum berdasarkan ketentuan hukum internasional, dimana setiap negara memiliki hak eksklusif di setiap bagian wilayahnya, yaitu di darat, udara dan laut. Saat ini, konsep hukum internasional telah merambah ke politik kajian hukum internasional, dimana berbagai aspek penegakan hukum berbaur dengan kebijakan suatu negara yang identik dengan aspek politik. Oleh karena itu, disimpulkan bahwa asas kedaulatan yang berlaku saat ini harus dilengkapi dengan asas hukum lain dalam hukum internasional.

show abstract

Understanding stakeholders' perspectives behind wildfires in Sicily: A Q‐methodology approach

Piroli,

La Mela Veca,

Mistry

et al. 2024

People and Nature

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Mediterranean wildfires persistently challenge regions due to climatic factors, changing land use, and abandonment of rural areas, posing threats to both ecosystems and human well‐being. Current fire management emphasizes fire exclusion, neglecting traditional methods and socio‐ ecological processes, thereby elevating the risk of catastrophic events and negatively impacting ecosystems. Collaborative efforts among stakeholders and decision makers are essential for effective wildfire mitigation; lack of engagement perpetuates conflicts, underscoring the need to integrate diverse perspectives to enhance environmental management policies. Focusing on Monreale, Sicily, as a representative of fire‐prone Mediterranean landscapes, this study uses Q‐Methodology to investigate stakeholder attitudes toward the causes and drivers of wildfires. Using Q‐Methodology, the research identifies shared values and discrepancies among stakeholders, revealing information on acceptable wildfire policies by discerning areas of consensus. The paper delves into various perspectives on socioeconomic and political dimensions in Sicily, unravelling conflicts and consensus areas for advancing fire management objectives. It concludes with policy insights and recommendations for future research. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.

show abstract

Wildfire bureaucracy: The affective dimensions of state engagement with Indigenous peoples in southeast Australia

Cited by 4 publications

References 39 publications

Validation of challenges in the management of conservation units considering the context of the Amazon Region

Validation of challenges in the management of conservation units considering the context of the Amazon Region

Rethinking the Sovereignty Principle: Is it a Legal Provision or a Political Domain Nowadays?

Understanding stakeholders' perspectives behind wildfires in Sicily: A Q‐methodology approach

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About