2010
DOI: 10.1128/jcm.00536-10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wild-Type MIC Distributions and Epidemiological Cutoff Values for the Triazoles and Six Aspergillus spp. for the CLSI Broth Microdilution Method (M38-A2 Document)

Abstract: Among the filamentous (mold) fungal infections, those caused by Aspergillus fumigatus and other Aspergillus spp. are the most common; these infections are associated with high morbidity and mortality, especially in the immunocompromised host (3,7,15,33). The triazoles itraconazole, voriconazole, and posaconazole have a broad spectrum of in vitro activity against molds and are important therapeutic agents for the systemic treatment and prevention of severe mold infections, including aspergillosis (33). Although… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

16
211
4
4

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 214 publications
(235 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
16
211
4
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The MIC distributions for isavuconazole, the other mold-active triazoles, and the echinocandins for five species of Aspergillus are shown in Table 3. In general, the MIC distributions for agents in both classes conformed to the WT distributions described previously (28,40). Isavuconazole MIC results were Յ2 g/ml for all species except A. niger SC, for which MIC values of Ն4 g/ml were determined for 27% of the isolates tested, similar to findings reported by Guinea and colleagues (7).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The MIC distributions for isavuconazole, the other mold-active triazoles, and the echinocandins for five species of Aspergillus are shown in Table 3. In general, the MIC distributions for agents in both classes conformed to the WT distributions described previously (28,40). Isavuconazole MIC results were Յ2 g/ml for all species except A. niger SC, for which MIC values of Ն4 g/ml were determined for 27% of the isolates tested, similar to findings reported by Guinea and colleagues (7).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Second, we used molecular methods to confirm the identification of the less common species of Candida, as well as the non-Candida yeasts and all of the filamentous fungi. Finally, we applied the newly revised clinical breakpoints (CBPs) for the echinocandins, fluconazole, and voriconazole to determine the resistance profiles of various Candida species (27) and used the epidemiological cutoff values (ECVs) for these agents, as well as itraconazole and posaconazole, to detect emerging resistance among less common species of Candida (27) and among Aspergillus isolates (28).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, MECs were defined microscopically as the lowest concentrations of drugs leading to the growth of small, rounded and compact hyphal forms, compared with long, unbranched hyphal clusters in the controls (CLSI, 2008). Considering the breakpoints proposed by Verweij et al (2009a) for itraconazole, voriconazole (susceptible: < 2 mg l À1 ; intermediate: 2 mg l À1 ; resistant: > 2 mg l À1 ) and posaconazole (susceptible: < 0.5 mg l À1 ; intermediate: 0.5 mg l À1 ; resistant: > 0.5 mg l À1 ), itraconazole (1 mg l À1 ), voriconazole (1 mg l À1 ) and posaconazole (0.5 mg l À1 ) with MICs above the proposed epidemiological cut-off values against A. fumigatus isolates were selected for further analysis (Espinel-Ingroff et al, 2010;Rodriguez-Tudela et al, 2008). PCR amplification started with an initial denaturation at 95 C for 1 min, followed by 35 cycles of denaturation at 94 C (60 s), 60 C (30 s) and 72 C (60 s) and a final 10 min extension at 72 C. PCR products were run on 2 % agarose gel (Ahmad et al, 2014).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The recent surveillance focus has been on how best to detect the emergence of resistance within a population of a given fungal species (2,7,8,(12)(13)(14)36). The development of epidemiological cutoff values (ECVs) has aided in the detection of non-WT strains in given populations, allowing a more focused approach to the molecular definition of strains presenting less-susceptible profiles (6,8,11,13,33,37).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%