2021
DOI: 10.1007/s10329-021-00913-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wild robust capuchin monkey interactions with sympatric primates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 44 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Interactions between gray woolly monkeys and other primates have previously been reported as rare, and the species has only occasionally been observed interacting with other species (Haugaasen & Peres, 2009; Izawa, 1975). We recorded an average of one interaction every 2 h of observation, which is higher than rates recorded for Platyrrhini living in poorer primate assemblages (e.g., Brachyteles hypoxanthus : Dias & Strier, 2000; Alouatta caraya : Fernández et al, 2017), and even for primate species that usually interact (e.g., capuchin monkeys: Falótico et al, 2021; Rose et al, 2003). We suggest that this high frequency of interactions reflects a crowding effect in the two forest fragments, since species with higher sighting rate (see Cavalcante et al, 2018) were often those with higher rates of interaction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Interactions between gray woolly monkeys and other primates have previously been reported as rare, and the species has only occasionally been observed interacting with other species (Haugaasen & Peres, 2009; Izawa, 1975). We recorded an average of one interaction every 2 h of observation, which is higher than rates recorded for Platyrrhini living in poorer primate assemblages (e.g., Brachyteles hypoxanthus : Dias & Strier, 2000; Alouatta caraya : Fernández et al, 2017), and even for primate species that usually interact (e.g., capuchin monkeys: Falótico et al, 2021; Rose et al, 2003). We suggest that this high frequency of interactions reflects a crowding effect in the two forest fragments, since species with higher sighting rate (see Cavalcante et al, 2018) were often those with higher rates of interaction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%