Wild cricket social networks show stability across generations

Abstract

BackgroundA central part of an animal's environment is its interactions with conspecifics. There has been growing interest in the potential to capture these interactions in the form of a social network. Such networks can then be used to examine how relationships among individuals affect ecological and evolutionary processes. However, in the context of selection and evolution, the utility of this approach relies on social network structures persisting across generations. This is an assumption that has been difficult to test because networks spanning multiple generations have not been available. We constructed social networks for six annual generations over a period of eight years for a wild population of the cricket Gryllus campestris.ResultsThrough the use of exponential random graph models (ERGMs), we found that the networks in any given year were able to predict the structure of networks in other years for some network characteristics. The capacity of a network model of any given year to predict the networks of other years did not depend on how far apart those other years were in time. Instead, the capacity of a network model to predict the structure of a network in another year depended on the similarity in population size between those years.ConclusionsOur results indicate that cricket social network structure resists the turnover of individuals and is stable across generations. This would allow evolutionary processes that rely on network structure to take place. The influence of network size may indicate that scaling up findings on social behaviour from small populations to larger ones will be difficult. Our study also illustrates the utility of ERGMs for comparing networks, a task for which an effective approach has been elusive.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12862-016-0726-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Testing the effect of early‐life reproductive effort on age‐related decline in a wild insect

“…These include male calling activity (below), encounters between individuals (Fisher et al. ), matings, fights between males (Fisher et al. ), predation events (Rodríguez‐Muñoz et al.…”

Comparing individual and population measures of senescence across 10 years in a wild insect population

“…Over 10 years (10 generations), we have been monitoring the survival and behavior of a natural population of the field cricket Gryllus campestris, living in a meadow in north Spain (Rodríguez-Muñoz et al 2010;Rodríguez-Muñoz et al 2011;Fisher et al 2016;Fisher et al 2018). Adult G. campestris are closely associated with burrows, which facilitates the recording of survival and behavioral data over individuals' entire adult lives.…”

Female clustering in cockroach aggregations—A case of social niche construction?

“…Our understanding of colony organisation and stability in the eusocial insects has been significantly improved by the application of network analyses (e.g., Charbonneau et al, 2013;Fewell, 2003;Jeanson, 2012;Naug, 2009). However, other insect species, many of which show levels of sociality approaching those of the eusocial insects (see Costa, 2006), have been almost entirely overlooked (but see Formica et al, 2012;and Fisher, Rodríguez-Muñoz, & Tregenza, 2016b, for rare examples). In our study, we therefore chose social network analysis as a tool to improve our understanding of insect social associations.…”