2014
DOI: 10.1080/11250003.2014.953220
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wild boars’ social structure in the Mediterranean habitat

Abstract: Wild boar Sus scrofa has become a pest throughout Europe, but its social system in this setting is unknown, making it difficult to implement an effective management strategy. We collected data on social grouping patterns by video-trapping the population living in an Italian Mediterranean National Park. We collected over 120 days of observations and the activities of 1431 wild boars. The seasonal variations in wild boar social organisation seem to be directly related to the biological cycle, with some exception… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a matter of fact, at the adaptive level the dominant status of males may be not as much relevant for yawn contagion in the light of the species biology. Under natural conditions, in both feral pigs and wild boars females with offspring form matrilineal units and join together in stable groups of variable size whereas solitary adult males live isolated and only temporarily join female groups 40,63,64 . This social structure can explain why adult females and not males form a linear hierarchy, with older sows being dominant over younger sows [65][66][67][68] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a matter of fact, at the adaptive level the dominant status of males may be not as much relevant for yawn contagion in the light of the species biology. Under natural conditions, in both feral pigs and wild boars females with offspring form matrilineal units and join together in stable groups of variable size whereas solitary adult males live isolated and only temporarily join female groups 40,63,64 . This social structure can explain why adult females and not males form a linear hierarchy, with older sows being dominant over younger sows [65][66][67][68] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most studies were conducted at artificial feeding places (Schneider, 1980;Saebel, 2007;Focardi et al, 2015) or in enclosures (e.g., Gundlach, 1968;Beuerle, 1975;Altmann, 1989) which does not necessarily enable to cover all behavioural elements that would normally occur over the course of a day in a wild population. There is a lack of recent field studies under natural conditions due to the fact that wild boar are widely seen as a pest because of their constant conflict terms with humans, such as crop damage, disease transmission (Keuling et al, 2013;Allwin et al, 2016;Probst et al, 2017) and zoonosis, road traffic accidents, and disturbances to sensitive plant communities (Maselli et al, 2014). Though, it is very important to understand the behaviour of wild boar to be able to implement effective management strategies for reduction plans (Maselli et al, 2014) as well as for animal welfare in enclosures (Kovács, Újváry & Szemethy, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a lack of recent field studies under natural conditions due to the fact that wild boar are widely seen as a pest because of their constant conflict terms with humans, such as crop damage, disease transmission (Keuling et al, 2013;Allwin et al, 2016;Probst et al, 2017) and zoonosis, road traffic accidents, and disturbances to sensitive plant communities (Maselli et al, 2014). Though, it is very important to understand the behaviour of wild boar to be able to implement effective management strategies for reduction plans (Maselli et al, 2014) as well as for animal welfare in enclosures (Kovács, Újváry & Szemethy, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sounder dynamics are poorly understood and are challenging to study without identification and monitoring of all individuals (Maselli et al 2014, Focardi et al 2015, Beasley et al 2018). Furthermore, disruption of sounder composition through removals or failure to maximize the number of individuals monitored has potential to result in misleading conclusions (Maselli et al 2014, Focardi et al 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sounder dynamics are poorly understood and are challenging to study without identification and monitoring of all individuals (Maselli et al 2014, Focardi et al 2015, Beasley et al 2018). Furthermore, disruption of sounder composition through removals or failure to maximize the number of individuals monitored has potential to result in misleading conclusions (Maselli et al 2014, Focardi et al 2015). Although recaptures occur (Sparklin et al 2009), researchers have documented the reluctance or avoidance of trap sites by individual animals following their presence when a trap is triggered and their cohorts are captured (Gaskamp 2012), emphasizing the importance of capturing entire sounders when possible.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%