Abstract:1 Semi-natural habitats are characterized by a high diversity of wildlife. However, other areas, e.g. old fields, can also play an important role in biodiversity conservation. 2 We assessed the species richness, abundance, and diversity of wild bees (Apiformes), including species of various functional groups in two contrasting and differently managed landscape types. For this study, we selected 15 xerothermic or sandy grasslands or extensively managed fresh meadows located in agricultural landscapes as well as… Show more
“…Many local and landscape factors can affect wild bee abundance and species richness in mid‐field woodlots. Significant factors include isolation (Steffan‐Dewenter & Tscharntke, 1999), habitat area (Steffan‐Dewenter, 2003), food resources (Alison et al, 2022; Kratschmer et al, 2019), and landscape heterogeneity (Jauker et al, 2009; Twerd & Sobieraj‐Betlińska, 2020). Generally, isolation combined with low landscape heterogeneity and small food resources can have a negative effect on the local abundance and species richness of bees.…”
1. Mid-field woodlots play an important role in maintaining biodiversity in agricultural landscapes. However, it is not clear whether non-linear or linear woodlots are most beneficial for wild bee conservation.2. We assessed the attractiveness of two common types of woodlots in an agricultural landscape in northern Poland (non-linear and linear: 7 and 9 sites, respectively) in terms of wild bee abundance, species richness, and functional diversity.3. Linear habitats had higher abundance of wild bees. However, woodlot type did not affect wild bee species composition or functional trait composition. Species composition responded significantly to measures of syntaxonomic heterogeneity and landscape heterogeneity. Woodlot area, landscape context (isolation and landscape heterogeneity), and syntaxonomic heterogeneity explained most of the differences among habitats (non-linear vs. linear) in wild bee abundance and species richness, regardless of the habitat type. The higher attractiveness of linear woodlots was due to increased food availability in the herbaceous layer in the spring-summer (June) and summer (July-August) periods.4. Linear woodlots have the potential to be used as tools for integrating agricultural production with biodiversity conservation and ecosystem services.
“…Many local and landscape factors can affect wild bee abundance and species richness in mid‐field woodlots. Significant factors include isolation (Steffan‐Dewenter & Tscharntke, 1999), habitat area (Steffan‐Dewenter, 2003), food resources (Alison et al, 2022; Kratschmer et al, 2019), and landscape heterogeneity (Jauker et al, 2009; Twerd & Sobieraj‐Betlińska, 2020). Generally, isolation combined with low landscape heterogeneity and small food resources can have a negative effect on the local abundance and species richness of bees.…”
1. Mid-field woodlots play an important role in maintaining biodiversity in agricultural landscapes. However, it is not clear whether non-linear or linear woodlots are most beneficial for wild bee conservation.2. We assessed the attractiveness of two common types of woodlots in an agricultural landscape in northern Poland (non-linear and linear: 7 and 9 sites, respectively) in terms of wild bee abundance, species richness, and functional diversity.3. Linear habitats had higher abundance of wild bees. However, woodlot type did not affect wild bee species composition or functional trait composition. Species composition responded significantly to measures of syntaxonomic heterogeneity and landscape heterogeneity. Woodlot area, landscape context (isolation and landscape heterogeneity), and syntaxonomic heterogeneity explained most of the differences among habitats (non-linear vs. linear) in wild bee abundance and species richness, regardless of the habitat type. The higher attractiveness of linear woodlots was due to increased food availability in the herbaceous layer in the spring-summer (June) and summer (July-August) periods.4. Linear woodlots have the potential to be used as tools for integrating agricultural production with biodiversity conservation and ecosystem services.
“…A decline in bee diversity will affect the pollination of many insect-pollinated crops and wild plant species. Although the honeybee (Apis mellifera L.) is generally regarded as the most important bee pollinator [25], wild bees are also relevant [22]. There has been growing concern about suspected declines in wild bee populations and the implications for agricultural and natural ecosystems [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Locally, species richness and abundance depend on plant species richness and cover as well as on the habitat composition and diversity in the surrounding landscape [9,22]. Furthermore, Schweiger et al [19] showed in an extensive sampling across Europe that wild bee communities are first influenced by the land use intensity in a region, then by the landscape structure, i.e., the proportion of semi-natural elements in the landscape.…”
Biodiversity has a great importance on agroecosystems, since it determines their actual and potential productivity. Bees provide crucial ecological service in the agricultural landscape in most geographical regions because they are considered to be predominant and most economically important group of pollinators. The objective of the study was the assessment of bees (domestic, wild, bumblebees) diversity in different types of habitats in agroecosystems of Central Forest-Steppe zone of Ukraine. Bee communities were investigated in agrocenosis, semi-natural habitats and ecotones between on territories of 6 farms. In total were sampled 1131 individuals of bees that were presented by 60 species. Species composition, density and richness of bees were investigated. Indexes of Shannon, Simpson and Sorensen were used for biodiversity analysis. The results indicated that the species richness of bees grows by gradient: agrocenosis – semi-natural habitat – ecotone. The most common and spread species were Apis mellifera L., Bombus lapidarius L., B. terrestris L., Halictus simplex Blüthgen, Systropha curvicornis Scopoli, Lasioglossum leucozonium Schrank. Density of Apidae increases in agrocenosis and falls in semi-natural habitats. Forming of bees’ fauna in agrocenosis depends on bees fauna of semi-natural habitats. Availability of ecotones promotes increasing of bee diversity in agroecosystems because it performs preservation function for biota and improves the spreading of bees and other species. The presented results could be used to predict changes in the formation of bee entomocomplexes in order to preserve their biodiversity.
Key words: agroecosystems, habitats, bees diversity, species richness, species density.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.