Wild and farmed meagre, Argyrosomus regius: A nutritional, sensory and histological assessment of quality differences

Saavedra, M.; Pereira, Teresa Gama; Carvalho, L. M.; Pousão-Ferreira, Pedro; Grade, Ana; Teixeira, Bárbara; Quental-Ferreira, Hugo; Mendes, Rogério; Bandarra, Narcisa M.; Gonçalves, Amparo

doi:10.1016/j.jfca.2017.07.028

Cited by 27 publications

(26 citation statements)

References 35 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In regards to the findings in the present study, the ratios of total essential amino acids to total amino acid levels (∑EAA/∑AA; 44.3% for farmed fish, 46.5% for wild fish) were in agreement with earlier reports in farmed (45.10%, 43.02%, 39.84%, 50.81%) and wild (45.77%, 42.78%, 40.33%, 51.35%) meagre (Saavedra et al, ), ussuri catfish (Wang et al, ), red tail (Jiang et al, ) and Hamzeh et al () respectively. The percentages of ∑EAA/∑AA for all three fish groups investigated were slightly lower but still comparable with the ratio given for egg (50%) according to FAO/WHO () report.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 93%

“…Our findings in the present study in terms of higher total essential amino acids (∑EAA) and lower total non-essential amino acids (∑NEAA) in wild axillary seabream versus farmed or farm-aggregated fish are in agreement with earlier reports in meagre (Argyrosomus regius, Saavedra et al, 2017), ussuri catfish (Pseudobagrus ussuriensis, Wang et al, 2014), beluga sturgeon (Huso huso, Hamzeh et al, 2015), barramundi (Lates calcarifer, Manthey-Karl, Lehmann, Ostermeyer, & Schröder, 2016). On contrast to our findings and earlier reports mentioned above, Baki, Gönener, and Kaya (2015), Manthey-Karl et al In regards to the findings in the present study, the ratios of total essential amino acids to total amino acid levels (∑EAA/∑AA; 44.3%…”

Section: Ta B L Esupporting

confidence: 94%

“…For the estimation of nutritional values and availabilities of the amino acids analysed have been multiplied by 0.625 according to Zhuang, Song, and Zhang (), thereafter amino acid scores (AAS) and chemical score (CS) have been performed using equations of FAO/WHO (, , ), also provided later by Zhuang et al (), Saavedra et al (), and Jiang et al () as follows:

Amino Acid Score, AAS (% false) = ({AA}_{FBP}, %) false/ ({AA}_{FW}, %)

where, AA FBP is the concentration level of amino acid per test protein (FBP: fish body protein) in per cent, and calculated as follows:

{AA}_{FBP} = essential amino acid \times 0.625

and AA FW represents the level of amino acid per protein according to the reference composition of FAO/WHO standard in per cent as given in Table .

Chemical Score, CS = ({AA}_{FBP}) false/ ({AA}_{EGG})

where, AA EGG shows the concentration of amino acid per protein in whole egg protein reference composition in per cent as provided in Table .…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…For the estimation of nutritional values and availabilities of the amino acids analysed have been multiplied by 0.625 according to Zhuang, Song, and Zhang (2010), thereafter amino acid scores (AAS) and chemical score (CS) have been performed using equations of FAO/WHO (1973,1991,2013), also provided later by Zhuang et al (2010), Saavedra et al (2017), and Jiang et al (2017) as follows:…”

Section: Calculation Of Amino Acid Scores Chemical Scores Essentimentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Nutritional quality of amino acid in farmed, farm‐aggregated and wild Axillary seabream ( Pagellus acarne ) with implications to Human Health

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study evaluated the nutritional quality of farmed and wild axillary seabream (Pagellus acarne R., 1827) focusing on amino acid profiles, with regards to possible interactions with wild fish aggregating around the cage facility. Total amino acids (∑AA), essential amino acids (∑EAA), non‐essential amino acids (∑NEAA) and neutral amino acids (∑NAA) in farmed fish were lower than those in the wild individuals (p > .05). Amino acid pattern in cage‐aggregated fish showed a slight decline from the wild populations, but still higher than the farmed fish. Based on the amino acid scores (AAS), lysine and leucine could be underlined as the ‘first limiting amino acids’, but all other AASs were over ‘1’, in accordance with reference amino acid contents of FAO/WHO (>1.00), showing that farmed axillary seabream provides high nutritional quality and can be considered as a favourable protein source. The ratios of ∑EAA/∑AA (44%–46%) and ∑EAA/∑NEAA (79%–86%) exceeded the minimum recommendation of 40% and >60% by FAO/WHO for all three groups. It can be concluded that axillary seabream either farmed, farm‐aggregated or distant wild fish presented high‐quality protein generating a healthy source for human food.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 93%

Section: Ta B L Esupporting

confidence: 94%

Amino Acid Score, AAS (% false) = ({AA}_{FBP}, %) false/ ({AA}_{FW}, %)

where, AA FBP is the concentration level of amino acid per test protein (FBP: fish body protein) in per cent, and calculated as follows:

{AA}_{FBP} = essential amino acid \times 0.625

and AA FW represents the level of amino acid per protein according to the reference composition of FAO/WHO standard in per cent as given in Table .

Chemical Score, CS = ({AA}_{FBP}) false/ ({AA}_{EGG})

where, AA EGG shows the concentration of amino acid per protein in whole egg protein reference composition in per cent as provided in Table .…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Calculation Of Amino Acid Scores Chemical Scores Essentimentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Nutritional quality of amino acid in farmed, farm‐aggregated and wild Axillary seabream ( Pagellus acarne ) with implications to Human Health

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The nutrient input from aquaculture effluent may cause a deterioration of water quality in the aquatic environment [3]. Besides, aquatic product quality is easily influenced by the condition of the water environment [4]. Some antibiotics are considered as "pseudo-persistent" contaminants due to their continuous release and lower degradability in the environment.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluation and Analysis of Water Quality of Marine Aquaculture Area

Zhang

et al. 2020

IJERPH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In the rapid development of marine aquaculture, the water quality of aquatic environments is regarded as a main limiting factor. Therefore, it is necessary to assess the water quality and environmental conditions in marine aquaculture areas and find out the main influencing factors regarding damage to the water quality environment. In the present research, pond aquaculture and cage aquaculture areas were sampled in May, August and November in 2018. Nine water quality indicators were detected, including pH, temperature, salinity, dissolved oxygen, molybdate-reactive phosphorus, chemical oxygen demand, chlorophyll a, inorganic nitrogen and antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs). Principal component analysis (PCA) was used to analyze the water quality conditions, spatial–temporal changes, and the driving factors in pond and cage aquaculture areas. The results showed that three main components were extracted from the pond aquaculture area, which explained 66.82% of the results, the most relevant factors are salinity, dissolved oxygen and ARGs. For the cage aquaculture area, three main components were extracted which can account for 72.99% of the results, the most relevant factors are chlorophyll a, salinity and dissolved oxygen. The comprehensive scores of the principal components indicated that the heaviest polluted months in pond and aquaculture areas were August and November, respectively. The water quality of the pond aquaculture area is mainly limited by the volume of the pond, while aquaculture activities and seasonality are the main factors for cage aquaculture. ARGs in cage culture areas showed more variety and frequency compared with pond culture areas, which indicated that terrestrial input might be one of the sources for ARGs occurrence. The results would be helpful for the relevant authorities to select water quality monitoring parameters in marine aquaculture areas.

show abstract

Comparison of nutritional quality, flesh quality, muscle cellularity, and expression of muscle growth-related genes between wild and recirculating aquaculture system (RAS)-farmed black rockfish (Sebastes schlegelii)

et al. 2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Wild and farmed meagre, Argyrosomus regius: A nutritional, sensory and histological assessment of quality differences

Cited by 27 publications

References 35 publications

Nutritional quality of amino acid in farmed, farm‐aggregated and wild Axillary seabream ( Pagellus acarne ) with implications to Human Health

Nutritional quality of amino acid in farmed, farm‐aggregated and wild Axillary seabream ( Pagellus acarne ) with implications to Human Health

Evaluation and Analysis of Water Quality of Marine Aquaculture Area

Comparison of nutritional quality, flesh quality, muscle cellularity, and expression of muscle growth-related genes between wild and recirculating aquaculture system (RAS)-farmed black rockfish (Sebastes schlegelii)

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About