2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-00668-6_3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wiki-MID: A Very Large Multi-domain Interests Dataset of Twitter Users with Mappings to Wikipedia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to address the semantic issues, research works have incorporated knowledge bases such as Wikipedia [29,[55][56][57][58][59][60][61], DBPedia [57,[62][63][64], WordNet [65][66][67], Freebase [68], Linked Open Data (LOD) cloud [49,69,70], and YAGO [71] to semantically represent user models. Semantic enrichment in the user modeling process is motivated by the need to enhance the accuracy of user models [22], increase the breadth of the keyphrases used to represent the users' interests [22,49], gather additional contextual knowledge about the entities and the relationships between them [30,49], infer more transparent and serendipitous user models [56], and bypass the problems of acronyms, synonyms, lexical variants [29], and polysemy, i.e., when a word may have multiple meanings which cannot be distinguished using keyword-based representation [30].…”
Section: Interest Model Generationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to address the semantic issues, research works have incorporated knowledge bases such as Wikipedia [29,[55][56][57][58][59][60][61], DBPedia [57,[62][63][64], WordNet [65][66][67], Freebase [68], Linked Open Data (LOD) cloud [49,69,70], and YAGO [71] to semantically represent user models. Semantic enrichment in the user modeling process is motivated by the need to enhance the accuracy of user models [22], increase the breadth of the keyphrases used to represent the users' interests [22,49], gather additional contextual knowledge about the entities and the relationships between them [30,49], infer more transparent and serendipitous user models [56], and bypass the problems of acronyms, synonyms, lexical variants [29], and polysemy, i.e., when a word may have multiple meanings which cannot be distinguished using keyword-based representation [30].…”
Section: Interest Model Generationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intrinsic evaluation helps to assess the quality of the constructed user interest profiles based on user studies [4,12,14] while extrinsic evaluations measure the quality of the user interest profiles by looking at its impact on the effectiveness of other applications such as news recommendation and retweet prediction [15,19,20]. Then, we describe the existing benchmark datasets and evaluation metrics [17]. Next, we introduce different applications that have been taking advantage of user interest modeling from social media platforms to improve their services.…”
Section: Tutorial Outlinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this regard, evaluating the performance of different user modeling strategies based on different datasets or settings can provide a clear understanding of when to use what types of user profiles, which is important for researchers in different domains as well as third-party application providers with different types of content to be personalized. A recent work by Tommaso et al (2018) provides a user interests dataset which is useful in this context. It includes half million Twitter users with an average of 90 multi-domain preferences per user on music, books, etc., where those preferences are extracted from multiple platforms based on the messages of those Twitter users who also use Spotify 40 , Goodreads 41 , etc.…”
Section: Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%