1996
DOI: 10.1090/s0002-9947-96-01643-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wiener’s test for space-time random walks and its applications

Abstract: Abstract. This paper establishes a criterion for whether a d-dimensional random walk on the integer lattice Z d visits a space-time subset infinitely often or not. It is a precise analogue of Wiener's test for regularity of a boundary point with respect to the classical Dirichlet problem. The test obtained is applied to strengthen the harder half of Kolmogorov's test for the random walk.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 20 publications
(1 reference statement)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2d γ∈S(Λ\{0}) |Λ\{0}| i=1 ϕ γ(i) − γ(i − 1)We first show that there is a constant κ d > 0, such that for any finite Λ ⊂ Z d , we havecap(Λ) ≥ κ d |Λ| 1− 2 d . (5.3)We use the variational characterisation of capacity (see the Appendix of[6]), which says that if G d is the Green kernel, µ is a non-negative measure on Λ, and c a positive constant ∀z ∈ Λ,z ′ ∈Λ G d (z, z ′ )µ(z ′ ) ≤ c =⇒ cap(Λ) ≥ z∈Λ µ(z) c .We have shown in the proof of Lemma 1.2 of[3], that there is κ d > 0 such that for any z ∈ Λz ′ ∈Λ G d (z, z ′ )µ(z ′ ) ≤ 1 κ d , with µ(z) = 1I Λ (z) |Λ| 2/d . (5.5)The desired bound (5.3) follows readily from (5.5).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2d γ∈S(Λ\{0}) |Λ\{0}| i=1 ϕ γ(i) − γ(i − 1)We first show that there is a constant κ d > 0, such that for any finite Λ ⊂ Z d , we havecap(Λ) ≥ κ d |Λ| 1− 2 d . (5.3)We use the variational characterisation of capacity (see the Appendix of[6]), which says that if G d is the Green kernel, µ is a non-negative measure on Λ, and c a positive constant ∀z ∈ Λ,z ′ ∈Λ G d (z, z ′ )µ(z ′ ) ≤ c =⇒ cap(Λ) ≥ z∈Λ µ(z) c .We have shown in the proof of Lemma 1.2 of[3], that there is κ d > 0 such that for any z ∈ Λz ′ ∈Λ G d (z, z ′ )µ(z ′ ) ≤ 1 κ d , with µ(z) = 1I Λ (z) |Λ| 2/d . (5.5)The desired bound (5.3) follows readily from (5.5).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%