2015
DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1547275
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wie wirksam sind schulbasierte Interventionen zur Prävention und/oder Reduktion von Substanzkonsum bei Schülern/-innen in Grund- und Sekundarschulen? Eine systematische Übersicht vorhandener Reviews

Abstract: School-based interventions should include capacity-promoting components and should address further levels beyond the individual, for example, organisational changes of the school setting. Further research is needed, in particular on the effectiveness of multi-component and multi-level interventions for the prevention of tobacco consumption.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A comprehensive review of the effectiveness of school-based interventions aimed at preventing or reducing substance use concludes that school programmes that boost self-confidence and take peer resistance into account (resisting peer pressure) are more successful than prevention measures that do not. Interventions that are based on several components and include different levels (and so go beyond the individual level to include organisational changes) are more effective, especially with regard to alcohol and cannabis use [ 56 ]. The BZgA also emphasises the role of the school, alongside the family and policy level in preventing substance use.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A comprehensive review of the effectiveness of school-based interventions aimed at preventing or reducing substance use concludes that school programmes that boost self-confidence and take peer resistance into account (resisting peer pressure) are more successful than prevention measures that do not. Interventions that are based on several components and include different levels (and so go beyond the individual level to include organisational changes) are more effective, especially with regard to alcohol and cannabis use [ 56 ]. The BZgA also emphasises the role of the school, alongside the family and policy level in preventing substance use.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Als einer der bedeutendsten Gründe für den Beginn und die Beibehaltung des Alkoholkonsums gilt dabei Gruppendruck unter Jugendlichen [ 12 14 ]. Obwohl diverse, an sozialen Einflüssen einsetzende Präventionsprogramme in ihrer Wirkung keine einheitlichen Ergebnisse zeigen, werden solche Ansätze in Reviews hingegen insgesamt positiv bewertet [ 15 ]. Die Mehrzahl der als effektiv bewerteten Präventionsprogramme, die im deutschen Schulsetting durchgeführt und evaluiert wurden, umfassen Aspekte eines Kompetenztrainings und adressieren u. a. die Fertigkeiten, Gruppenzwang zu widerstehen (z.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified