2014
DOI: 10.1002/bapi.201410007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wie genau sind unsere Energiepässe?

Abstract: Member States of the European Union are obliged to present a calculation method and certificate for the energy performance for buildings according to the guidelines 2002/91/EG und 2010/31/EU. In Luxembourg it is obligatory to add the real final energy consumption to the certificate after 3 years. The measured real final energy consumptions and the calculated ones were compared for 125 single-family homes and 105 multi-family homes with 870 dwellings in total. The mean calculated values for single-family homes … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This goes along well with the results of other studies [3], [4], [5], [6]. In Figure 3 the frequency distribution and the classification into low, normal and high consuming buildings according to Table 1 is shown.…”
Section: Public Building Stock In Luxembourgsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…This goes along well with the results of other studies [3], [4], [5], [6]. In Figure 3 the frequency distribution and the classification into low, normal and high consuming buildings according to Table 1 is shown.…”
Section: Public Building Stock In Luxembourgsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…We set U-values (Table 2) consistent with national reference values for existing buildings [78]. U-values for older buildings were adapted based on the recommendations of other studies [84] and a building period was added for constructions erected after 2008, when a new thermal regulation came into force in Luxembourg.…”
Section: Building Envelopementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Boundary values were identified according to the results of the GIS analysis (floor surface area), normative limits and reference calculation values [56,61], other studies [62,66] and qualified assumptions. A screening test (EE method) was run for each of the 12 building cohorts described in Section 4.1 using the function "morris" in the R package "sensitivity" [63] and setting the number of repetitions r to 10.…”
Section: Screening Of Input Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Floor surface area (A n ) distributions were generated based on the building GIS data: lognormal distributions were fitted for each of the building cohorts and then tested against the original sample by means of the Kolmogorov-Smirnoff test [68]. The probability distributions for window-to-façade ratios, indoor set-point temperature and envelope tightness were identified according to relevant literature [19,51,62,66]. U-values were assumed to be normally distributed, similarly to Mauro et al [19], and centred on typical values for Luxembourg depending on the period of construction [61].…”
Section: Characterization Of the Probability Distribution Of Input Pamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation