2021
DOI: 10.1126/science.abf3870
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Widespread reforestation before European influence on Amazonia

Abstract: An estimated 90 to 95% of Indigenous people in Amazonia died after European contact. This population collapse is postulated to have caused decreases in atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations at around 1610 CE, as a result of a wave of land abandonment in the wake of disease, slavery, and warfare, whereby the attendant reversion to forest substantially increased terrestrial carbon sequestration. On the basis of 39 Amazonian fossil pollen records, we show that there was no synchronous reforestation event asso… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
16
0
3

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
6
16
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Notably, an additional bottleneck was inferred for the Tupí, starting at ∼37 gBP (∼1036 BP) before contacting Europeans and happening up to ∼15 gBP (∼420 BP). This population decline agrees with a previous report based on Amazonian fossil pollen analysis, which pointed to an expansion of the Amazon forest, a proxy for human population decline, at approximately 300–600 years before the European arrival ( Bush et al 2021 ). However, the inferred time for the population collapse might be influenced by differences in the generational interval; a new study ( Coll Macià et al 2021 ) inferred that South American lowlanders have the shortest generation intervals in the Americas, which could ultimately translate into older dates for inferences based on the number of generations, including the inference of older population collapse dates from the size distribution of IBD segments.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Notably, an additional bottleneck was inferred for the Tupí, starting at ∼37 gBP (∼1036 BP) before contacting Europeans and happening up to ∼15 gBP (∼420 BP). This population decline agrees with a previous report based on Amazonian fossil pollen analysis, which pointed to an expansion of the Amazon forest, a proxy for human population decline, at approximately 300–600 years before the European arrival ( Bush et al 2021 ). However, the inferred time for the population collapse might be influenced by differences in the generational interval; a new study ( Coll Macià et al 2021 ) inferred that South American lowlanders have the shortest generation intervals in the Americas, which could ultimately translate into older dates for inferences based on the number of generations, including the inference of older population collapse dates from the size distribution of IBD segments.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…La Amazonía brasileña es también el hogar de una riqueza cultural, incluyendo el conocimiento tradicional asociado al patrimonio genético y la forma de utilizar los recursos naturales sin agotarlos o destruir el hábitat natural [25]. La Amazonía pudo tener una población de 4 a 5 millones de habitantes a la llegada de los europeos en 1492; hoy, no pasan de 900.000 habitantes [26].…”
Section: La Amazonía Brasileñaunclassified
“…El grado de deforestación en la Amazonía en Brasil, se ha convertido en una amenaza de tal dimensión para el equilibrio del ecosistema y su megabiodiversidad, problemática ampliamente registrada en varios estudios [1][2][3]19,26]. Según el PRODES-Amazônia [42], los datos de intervención antrópica (deforestación seguida por quema) abarcaron en el 2019, para el Estado de Pará-Brasil, 271862.57 km 2 , Mato Grosso 218741.90 km 2 , Maranhão 106510.04 km 2 , Rondônia 94767.13 km 2 , Amazonas 41895.57 km 2 , Tocantins 30663.63 km 2 , Acre 24033.01 km 2 , Roraima 11311.12 km 2 y Amapá 3112.88 km 2 [42].…”
Section: La Amazonía Brasileñaunclassified
“…Changes in the quality of Amazon soils associated to land use changes have been assessed by soil chemical indicators [43][44][45], soil physical indicators [43], soil biological indicators [46][47][48][49] and combinations of soil variables [33,41,48,49]. Pasture, as the most intense land use change, presents the most dissimilar conditions among other land uses, such as its microbial composition [50] and microbial activity [51].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%