2018
DOI: 10.1002/2017gl075659
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Widespread Moulin Formation During Supraglacial Lake Drainages in Greenland

Abstract: Moulins permit access of surface meltwater to the glacier bed, causing basal lubrication and ice speedup in the ablation zone of western Greenland during summer. Despite the substantial impact of moulins on ice dynamics, the conditions under which they form are poorly understood. We assimilate a time series of ice surface velocity from a network of eleven Global Positioning System receivers into an ice sheet model to estimate ice sheet stresses during winter, spring, and summer in a ∼30 × 10 km region. Surface… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
79
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 87 publications
(173 reference statements)
4
79
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Rather, the primary impact of lake hydrofracture is in opening surface-to-bed connections. The spatial density of such events has been shown to affect the rate of development of channelized drainage (Banwell et al, 2016) and to act as a key mechanism for the creation of moulins away from crevasse fields or current lake basins (Hoffman et al, 2018), which then drain a significant proportion of the overall surface melt as we find in this study and previous work .…”
Section: Model Sensitivitysupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Rather, the primary impact of lake hydrofracture is in opening surface-to-bed connections. The spatial density of such events has been shown to affect the rate of development of channelized drainage (Banwell et al, 2016) and to act as a key mechanism for the creation of moulins away from crevasse fields or current lake basins (Hoffman et al, 2018), which then drain a significant proportion of the overall surface melt as we find in this study and previous work .…”
Section: Model Sensitivitysupporting
confidence: 74%
“…This peak speed then propagated downstream from 33N1 to 28N4 (10:45 UTC), GULL (12:30 UTC), 22N4 (14:46 UTC), 25N1 (16:14 UTC), FOXX (16:45 UTC), and finally at 19N1 (18:44 UTC). GULL had a more muted velocity response and is located on a branch of the predicted subglacial drainage path within Sermeq Avannarleq, suggesting that the propagation of the meltwater from the first two lake drainages induced stresses that triggered the drainage at GULL (Hoffman et al, ). Station 25N1 also has a more muted velocity response, potentially due its location relative to modeled subglacial flow paths.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Without snow cover, supraglacial meltwater retention on bare ice can become potentially important, particularly above~900 m asl, where supraglacial lakes more prevalent (e.g., Koziol et al, 2017;Liang et al, 2012;Morriss et al, 2013). Retention of meltwater within supraglacial lakes can exacerbate spatial differences in meltwater delivery to the bed, resulting in a stronger gradient in ice acceleration and regionally tensile strain rate anomalies, which can trigger additional surface-to-bed connections, potentially including the observed lake drainages on day~182 and 188 in our study area (Figures 4a and 5a; Christoffersen et al, 2018;Hoffman et al, 2018).…”
Section: 1029/2017jf004585mentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The farthest inland location where water reaches the glacier bed is indeed a topic of current studies (e.g. Poinar and others, 2015;Gagliardini and Werder, 2018;Hoffman and others, 2018a). Introducing localised inputs also modifies the local effective pressure (with lower effective pressure at the moulin locations) and the distribution of the efficient channelised drainage system (see supplementary figures).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%