2017
DOI: 10.1038/srep42997
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Widespread methane seepage along the continental margin off Svalbard - from Bjørnøya to Kongsfjorden

Abstract: Numerous articles have recently reported on gas seepage offshore Svalbard, because the gas emission from these Arctic sediments was thought to result from gas hydrate dissociation, possibly triggered by anthropogenic ocean warming. We report on findings of a much broader seepage area, extending from 74° to 79°, where more than a thousand gas discharge sites were imaged as acoustic flares. The gas discharge occurs in water depths at and shallower than the upper edge of the gas hydrate stability zone and generat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

14
110
1
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 128 publications
(148 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
14
110
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…A comprehensive study by Myhre et al (2016) calculated a median methane flux of only 3 µmol m 2 d −1 , which is supported by a median methane flux of 2 µmol m 2 d −1 for the coastal waters of Svalbard (Mau et al, 2017), and this value lies within the previously reported range of 4 to 20 µmol m 2 d −1 ; Table 5). For the North American Arctic Ocean and its shelf seas, rather low methane fluxes of 1.3 µmol m 2 d −1 have been reported (Fenwick et al, 2017).…”
Section: Diffusive Methane Fluxsupporting
confidence: 84%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…A comprehensive study by Myhre et al (2016) calculated a median methane flux of only 3 µmol m 2 d −1 , which is supported by a median methane flux of 2 µmol m 2 d −1 for the coastal waters of Svalbard (Mau et al, 2017), and this value lies within the previously reported range of 4 to 20 µmol m 2 d −1 ; Table 5). For the North American Arctic Ocean and its shelf seas, rather low methane fluxes of 1.3 µmol m 2 d −1 have been reported (Fenwick et al, 2017).…”
Section: Diffusive Methane Fluxsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…When the total methane inventory was set to 100 %, a median of 1 % (range 0.3-3.8 %) was consumed within 1 day by bacteria within the system, while a median of 8 % (1-47 %) left the system and entered the atmosphere. A similar estimation has been made for the coastal waters of Svalbard (Mau et al, 2017), where a much higher fraction of the dissolved methane (0.02-7.7 %) was oxidised, and only a minor fraction (0.07 %) was transferred into the atmosphere. However, the water in this region was much deeper; thus, the ratio of water volume (including the methane oxidation activity) to the surface area (including the diffusive methane flux) was much larger.…”
Section: Role Of Microbial Methane Oxidation Vs Diffusive Methane Fluxsupporting
confidence: 67%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…During the last few years, the first studies have determined methane oxidation rates from seawater in these regions to cover a range from 10 −4 up to 3.2 nmol L −1 d −1 (Gentz et al, 2014;Lorenson et al, 2016;Mau et al, 2013Mau et al, , 2017Steinle et al, 2015). In only two of these studies, both performed off Svalbard, oxidation rate measurements were combined with analysis of the microbial community.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%