Widespread evidence for horizontal transfer of transposable elements across Drosophila genomes

199

236

Horizontal transfer (HT) of genetic material is central to the architecture and evolution of prokaryote genomes. Within eukaryotes, the majority of HTs reported so far are transfers of transposable elements (TEs). These reports essentially come from studies focusing on specific lineages or types of TEs. Because of the lack of large-scale survey, the amount and impact of HT of TEs (HTT) in eukaryote evolution, as well as the trends and factors shaping these transfers, are poorly known. Here, we report a comprehensive analysis of HTT in 195 insect genomes, representing 123 genera and 13 of the 28 insect orders. We found that these insects were involved in at least 2,248 HTT events that essentially occurred during the last 10 My. We show that DNA transposons transfer horizontally more often than retrotransposons, and unveil phylogenetic relatedness and geographical proximity as major factors facilitating HTT in insects. Even though our study is restricted to a small fraction of insect biodiversity and to a recent evolutionary timeframe, the TEs we found to be horizontally transferred generated up to 24% (2.08% on average) of all nucleotides of insect genomes. Together, our results establish HTT as a major force shaping insect genome evolution.horizontal transfer | transposable elements | insects | genome evolution | biogeography H orizontal transfer (HT) is the transmission of genetic material between organisms through a mechanism other than reproduction. In prokaryotes, HT is pervasive, its mechanisms are well understood, and it is now viewed as one of the main forces shaping genome architecture and evolution (1, 2). In contrast, the study of HT in eukaryotes is less documented, but has been increasingly investigated. The majority of genes horizontally acquired by eukaryotes come from bacteria, but the extent to which these transfers have contributed to eukaryote evolution is still unclear (3, 4). Gene transfers from eukaryote to eukaryote appear to be largely limited to filamentous organisms, such as oomycetes and fungi (5, 6).In animals and plants, very few cases of such horizontal gene transfers (HGTs) have been reported so far (7,8). In fact, most of the genetic material that is horizontally transferred in animals and plants consists of transposable elements (TEs) (9-11), which are pieces of DNA able to move from a chromosomal locus to another (12). The greater ability of TEs to move between organisms certainly relates to their intrinsic ability to transpose within genomes, which genes cannot do. HT of TEs (HTT) may allow these elements to enter naive genomes, which they invade by making copies of themselves, and then escape before they become fully silenced by anti-TE defenses (13). A growing number of studies have identified such HTT (11,[14][15][16]. However, a common drawback of these studies has been the inclusion of a limited set of TEs (11) or organisms (16), which hampers our understanding of the breadth of HTT, its contribution to genome evolution, and of the factors and barriers shaping these transfe...

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Massive horizontal transfer of transposable elements in insects

Peccoud

Loiseau

Cordaux

et al. 2017

199

236

“…There is evidence that poxviruses have vectored retroposons between reptiles and mammals, and members of four DNA TE families are found in both vertebrates and blood-sucking triatomid bugs, suggesting possible mechanisms for intertaxon transfers. A study in Drosophila genomes finds that approximately one-third of TE families originated from recent interspecies lateral transfers, with an estimated transfer rate of 0.04 events per family per million years (30). In fact, lateral movement across host taxa is believed to be an important mechanism for long-term maintenance of TE families.…”

Section: Types Of Sges and Their Consequencesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Selfish genetic elements, genetic conflict, and evolutionary innovation

Werren

2011

379

373

Genomes are vulnerable to selfish genetic elements (SGEs), which enhance their own transmission relative to the rest of an individual's genome but are neutral or harmful to the individual as a whole. As a result, genetic conflict occurs between SGEs and other genetic elements in the genome. There is growing evidence that SGEs, and the resulting genetic conflict, are an important motor for evolutionary change and innovation. In this review, the kinds of SGEs and their evolutionary consequences are described, including how these elements shape basic biological features, such as genome structure and gene regulation, evolution of new genes, origin of new species, and mechanisms of sex determination and development. The dynamics of SGEs are also considered, including possible "evolutionary functions" of SGEs.

“…Third, sequences that are not annotated in Flybase but had some limited sequence identity with ZAM and Tirant fragments correspond in fact to a newly identified element that we named Agoriino and a Pifo element. Pifo was previously identified in Drosophila yakuba (20) and a 4,414-bp degenerate Pifo in D. melanogaster (21). Consequently, only one vestige of ZAM is present at position X:21649838..21655021.…”

Section: In Silico Analysis Of the Flam Locus Reveals A Large Number mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Bartolomé et al (20) suggested that one-third of the TE families originated from recent horizontal transfer between D. melanogaster, D. simulans, and D. yakuba. Our data reveal that this rate is even higher in flam, reaching two-third of the recent elements.…”

Section: Structural Modifications Affecting Flam May Explain Differenmentioning

confidence: 99%

Distribution, evolution, and diversity of retrotransposons at the flamenco locus reflect the regulatory properties of piRNA clusters

Zanni

Eymery

Coiffet

et al. 2013

117

159

Most of our understanding of Drosophila heterochromatin structure and evolution has come from the annotation of heterochromatin from the isogenic y; cn bw sp strain. However, almost nothing is known about the heterochromatin's structural dynamics and evolution. Here, we focus on a 180-kb heterochromatic locus producing Piwi-interacting RNAs (piRNA cluster), the flamenco (flam) locus, known to be responsible for the control of at least three transposable elements (TEs). We report its detailed structure in three different Drosophila lines chosen according to their capacity to repress or not to repress the expression of two retrotransposons named ZAM and Idefix, and we show that they display high structural diversity. Numerous rearrangements due to homologous and nonhomologous recombination, deletions and segmental duplications, and loss and gain of TEs are diverse sources of active genomic variation at this locus. Notably, we evidence a correlation between the presence of ZAM and Idefix in this piRNA cluster and their silencing. They are absent from flam in the strain where they are derepressed. We show that, unexpectedly, more than half of the flam locus results from recent TE insertions and that most of the elements concerned are prone to horizontal transfer between species of the melanogaster subgroup. We build a model showing how such high and constant dynamics of a piRNA master locus open the way to continual emergence of new patterns of piRNA biogenesis leading to changes in the level of transposition control.RNAi | gene silencing | epigenetics O ver the course of evolution, transposable elements (TEs) have accumulated in the genomes of eukaryotes, where they can account for up to 85% of the DNA (1). Most of these sequences have lost their ability to transpose. They are now stable components of the genomes. Their conservation throughout evolution suggests that they may confer advantageous effects to their hosts. However, transposition of the copies that remain functional could generate deleterious mutations if they were not severely repressed by their host. RNAi, which is a gene-silencing mechanism triggered by small RNAs (reviewed in ref.2), has been identified as being the main cellular machinery involved in the "taming" of TEs (reviewed in refs. 3-5). RNAi pathways involve small RNAs of diverse families. Among them, Piwiinteracting RNAs (piRNAs) have been shown to be involved in TE silencing in the Drosophila ovary. These piRNAs, 23-29 nt long, are bound by the Argonaute proteins Piwi, Argonaute 3, or Aubergine. They are produced by discrete genomic loci named piRNA clusters, which have been described as containing vestiges of TEs (6). One of these loci, the flamenco (flam) locus, extends over 180 kilobases (kb) on the Drosophila X chromosome. It is proximal to the DISCO interacting protein 1 gene (DIP1) and close to pericentromeric heterochromatin. Before the identification of piRNAs, this locus had been shown to regulate the Gypsy retrotransposon (7, 8 (6) showed the potential for the flam cluster to pr...