2017
DOI: 10.1002/berj.3309
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Widening the educational capabilities of socio‐economically disadvantaged students through a model of social and cultural capital development

Abstract: Widening participation programmes aim to increase the progression of students from low socio‐economic status (SES) groups to higher education. This research proposes that the human capabilities approach is a good justice‐based framework within which to consider the social and cultural capital processes that impact upon the educational capabilities of young people from low SES groups. It presents a case study which examines the developing capability set of Irish students from a representative sample of schools … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
19
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
(58 reference statements)
0
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Bridging social capital may therefore provide an ideal mechanism to understand how individuals overcome the barriers associated with educational disadvantage. Access to bridging capital is crucial for facilitating progression to HE in low SES groups as it provides access to 'new' forms of capital, whereas bonding capital has the potential to close down opportunities within networks where progression to HE is not the norm (Vaughn et al, 2015;Hannon et al, 2017;Nicholson & Cleland, 2017. Building bridges; alternative entry routes to HE. Since the late 1990s, there have been several policy changes in both England and Ireland to try to improve access to HE for low SES groups.…”
Section: Academic Identity Confidence and Belonging 555mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Bridging social capital may therefore provide an ideal mechanism to understand how individuals overcome the barriers associated with educational disadvantage. Access to bridging capital is crucial for facilitating progression to HE in low SES groups as it provides access to 'new' forms of capital, whereas bonding capital has the potential to close down opportunities within networks where progression to HE is not the norm (Vaughn et al, 2015;Hannon et al, 2017;Nicholson & Cleland, 2017. Building bridges; alternative entry routes to HE. Since the late 1990s, there have been several policy changes in both England and Ireland to try to improve access to HE for low SES groups.…”
Section: Academic Identity Confidence and Belonging 555mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Others assert that academic achievement is the primary barrier to HE participation (Chowdry et al ., ), with large disparities observed between the attainment of low SES students and their more affluent counterparts (McKnight, ). This approach frames access to HE in terms of human capital; seeing education reform and curriculum changes as preconditions to improved economic responsiveness and increasing employment opportunities for low SES students (Hannon et al ., ). Universities currently active in promoting WP under this policy focus are employing activities like subject supports, guidance and learning supports alongside financial supports.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…As Hannon et al . () discuss, there are structural factors beyond academic ability that either support or hinder young people in developing aspirations. Awareness of these structural factors can help students navigate university applications.…”
Section: Discussion: How Schools Can Nurture the Capability To Aspirementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This also recognises, in Eccles' (2009) terms, the complex nature of decision-making: it links to wider processes of maturation, and individual and collective identity formation, including the emergent nature of long-term aspirations. As Hannon et al (2017) discuss, there are structural factors beyond academic ability that either support or hinder young people in developing aspirations. Awareness of these structural factors can help students navigate university applications.…”
Section: Discussion: How Schools Can Nurture the Capability To Aspirementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Others assert that academic achievement is the primary barrier to participation (Chowdry, Crawford, Dearden, Goodman, & Vignoles;Jones & Thomas, 2005). With large disparities seen between the educational attainment of disadvantaged students and their more affluent counterparts (Coley, 2002;Burgess, Ding, Hargreaves, Van Ryn & Phelan, 2008;Feinstein, 2003;McKnight, 2015) this approach frames access to high-status professions in terms of human capital; seeing the barriers in terms of an individual skill deficit (Hannon et al, 2017;Thomas, Yorke & Woodrow, 2003). Both approaches emphasize barriers which exist within the individual, and indicate impoverished levels of personal agency, including reduced freedom to decide and reduced power to act and be effective (Crocker & Robeyns, 2009;Wilson-Strydom, 2012, 2016.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%