The Thrity-Seventh Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems &Amp; Computers, 2003
DOI: 10.1109/acssc.2003.1292015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Widely-linear beamforming

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More precisely, when the SOI and observations are zeromean, jointly Gaussian but non-circular, the optimal beamformer becomes WL [6], which corresponds to a particular non-linear structure weighting linearly and independently the observations and their complex conjugate. For this reason, a WL MVDR beamformer (called WL MVDR 1 ), exploiting the potential SO non-circularity of the interference only, has been introduced recently in [9] for spectrum monitoring of radiocommunications and its implementation has been discussed in [10]. To take into account the potential SO non-circularity of both the SOI and the interference, a second WL MVDR beamformer (called WL MVDR 2 ) has been further introduced in [11], [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More precisely, when the SOI and observations are zeromean, jointly Gaussian but non-circular, the optimal beamformer becomes WL [6], which corresponds to a particular non-linear structure weighting linearly and independently the observations and their complex conjugate. For this reason, a WL MVDR beamformer (called WL MVDR 1 ), exploiting the potential SO non-circularity of the interference only, has been introduced recently in [9] for spectrum monitoring of radiocommunications and its implementation has been discussed in [10]. To take into account the potential SO non-circularity of both the SOI and the interference, a second WL MVDR beamformer (called WL MVDR 2 ) has been further introduced in [11], [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1) Array Processing: The merits of impropriety adaptation in array processing algorithms are widely studied in [99], [335]- [338]. For example, coherent processing (incorporating complementary covariance) for detection and estimation enjoys a 3dB gain over non-coherent processing [32].…”
Section: B Signal Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%