1979
DOI: 10.2307/2025881
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wide Reflective Equilibrium and Theory Acceptance in Ethics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
186
0
15

Year Published

2002
2002
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 847 publications
(209 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
186
0
15
Order By: Relevance
“…20 Neither the principles nor the judgments are prior; each is subject to adjustment by reference to the other. In the case of wide reflective equilibrium, so called by Daniels (1979), we bring in pertinent science, settled beliefs about human nature, and other facts as background. 21 Wide reflective equilibrium seems close to AristotleÕs views.…”
Section: Second Issue: Ordinary Opinionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20 Neither the principles nor the judgments are prior; each is subject to adjustment by reference to the other. In the case of wide reflective equilibrium, so called by Daniels (1979), we bring in pertinent science, settled beliefs about human nature, and other facts as background. 21 Wide reflective equilibrium seems close to AristotleÕs views.…”
Section: Second Issue: Ordinary Opinionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is the fault of the philosophical literature in question, not of the notion of 'wide reflective equilibrium' as such (c.f. Daniels 1979). An opposite defect might be thought to have affected certain manifestations of nineteenth and twentieth Century European philosophy, including some of the work growing out of the so-called 'Frankfurt School ' (c.f.…”
Section: Living With Contingencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We would suggest that ethical theories have a different and in a sense broader role than ethical intuitions or emotions. The role we see for ethical theories is inspired by Normal Daniels' discussion of wide reflective equilibrium (Daniels, 1979(Daniels, , 1996.…”
Section: Van De Poel and L Royakkersmentioning
confidence: 99%