1999
DOI: 10.1086/307268
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wide‐Field CCD Photometry of the Globular Cluster M30

Abstract: We present new V I photometry for the halo globular cluster M30 (NGC 7099 = C2137-174), and compute luminosity functions (LFs) in both bands for samples of about 15,000 hydrogen-burning stars from near the tip of the red giant branch (RGB) to over four magnitudes below the main-sequence (MS) turnoff. We confirm previously observed features of the LF that are at odds with canonical theoretical predictions: an excess of stars on subgiant branch (SGB) approximately 0.4 mag above the turnoff and an excess number o… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
51
2

Year Published

1999
1999
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
10
51
2
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been recently pointed out that, at least for the metal-poor clusters, the agreement of the models with the observed LFs for the GGC stars is far from satisfactory (Faulkner & Swenson 1993 ;Bolte 1994 and references therein). Sandquist et al (1999), by comparing the LF of M30 with the theoretical LFs from Bergbusch & VandenBerg (1992) and VandenBerg et al (1999), conÐrm this result, at least for the most metal-poor clusters, and suggest that it might be the consequence of some deep-mixing events. On the other hand, Silvestri et al (1998) claim that their set of models strongly reduces the discrepancy with the observed LFs, though they cannot provide the reasons for the di †erences among the di †erent models.…”
Section: Luminosity Functionsmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…It has been recently pointed out that, at least for the metal-poor clusters, the agreement of the models with the observed LFs for the GGC stars is far from satisfactory (Faulkner & Swenson 1993 ;Bolte 1994 and references therein). Sandquist et al (1999), by comparing the LF of M30 with the theoretical LFs from Bergbusch & VandenBerg (1992) and VandenBerg et al (1999), conÐrm this result, at least for the most metal-poor clusters, and suggest that it might be the consequence of some deep-mixing events. On the other hand, Silvestri et al (1998) claim that their set of models strongly reduces the discrepancy with the observed LFs, though they cannot provide the reasons for the di †erences among the di †erent models.…”
Section: Luminosity Functionsmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…A portion is shown here for guidance regarding its form and content. Sandquist et al (1999). Figures 12 and 13 present the results of the above calculations for 200 pixel (2A3) radial bins in both V and I bandpasses.…”
Section: Artificial Star Testsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…These fractions are assumed to be higher than the binary fraction of M30 at present day (about 7%, Milone et al 2012) because the binary fraction decreases with time due to the dynamical interactions and binary evolution (Ivanova et al 2005). In addition, the initial mass of M30 is simply assumed to be twice as massive as the current mass of M30 (log (M/M ⊙ )=5.3, Sandquist et al 1999) as the globular clusters may have lost a significant fraction of total mass driven by relaxation, stellar evolution and the tidal field of the Galaxy (Vesperini & Heggie 1997). Because the binaries are more difficult to lose from the globular clusters than single stars, the binary fraction in the lost stars is assumed to be half of the initial binary fraction.…”
Section: Binary Population Synthesismentioning
confidence: 99%