2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.radmeas.2007.11.062
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wide energy range efficiency calibration for a lanthanum bromide scintillation detector

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In spite of the higher brightness, our LaBr 3 :Ce films have not yet achieved the energy resolution of the reference crystal as shown in Table 1, which may be attributable to non-uniformities in dopant distribution, non-uniformity in light collection efficiency, and/or possibly phase variations in the polycrystalline structure. Our results for standard LaBr3:Ce crystals are in agreement with those previously reported in the literature [6]. Notably, the films demonstrate 1/e scintillation decay on the order of 8 ns, which is approximately a factor of two faster than that reported in literature for single crystals, and afterglow characteristics comparable to that of LaBr 3 :Ce crystalline material, indicating that the process of vapor deposition does not introduce any significant defect states that could compromise speed [3].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…In spite of the higher brightness, our LaBr 3 :Ce films have not yet achieved the energy resolution of the reference crystal as shown in Table 1, which may be attributable to non-uniformities in dopant distribution, non-uniformity in light collection efficiency, and/or possibly phase variations in the polycrystalline structure. Our results for standard LaBr3:Ce crystals are in agreement with those previously reported in the literature [6]. Notably, the films demonstrate 1/e scintillation decay on the order of 8 ns, which is approximately a factor of two faster than that reported in literature for single crystals, and afterglow characteristics comparable to that of LaBr 3 :Ce crystalline material, indicating that the process of vapor deposition does not introduce any significant defect states that could compromise speed [3].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Accordingly, it seems that no experimental data have been used to evaluate any of these three isotopes. Since the 1970s significant advances have occurred in detector development, especially with the release of new lanthanide-halide scintillation detectors [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24], as well as new data acquisition and signal-processing techniques [25,26]. Consequently, we wanted to take advantage of these advancements toward high-quality measurements of the γ -decay heat from the fission process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that fully spent fuel assemblies produce 10 15 gamma rays per second, resulting in the count-rate capability being an important criterion among the requirements. New scintillation detectors, such as lanthanum bromide (LaBr 3 ), offer both significantly higher count-rate capabilities and higher energy resolution (~3% at the 662-keV gamma ray of 137 Cs) than the traditional sodium iodide (NaI) scintillator (~7% at the 662-keV gamma ray of 137 Cs) [19][20][21]. These new scintillation detectors may be an effective alternative for nuclear spent fuel applications, provided that the reduced resolution is sufficient for the measurement task at hand-in the current case, the measurement of passive gamma rays.…”
Section: Labr 3 Scintillation Detector As An Alternative Detector Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%