2017
DOI: 10.1097/01.aoa.0000512011.96214.d3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wide Differences in Mode of Delivery Within Europe: Risk-stratified Analyses of Aggregated Routine Data from the Euro-Peristat Study

Abstract: Objective To use data from routine sources to compare rates of obstetric intervention in Europe both overall and for subgroups at higher risk of intervention.Design Retrospective analysis of aggregated routine data.Setting Thirty-one European countries or regions contributing data on mode of delivery to the Euro-Peristat project.Population Births in participating countries in 2010.Methods Countries provided aggregated data about overall rates of obstetric intervention and about caesarean section rates for spec… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
11
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
3
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding is in accordance with other studies [9,[21][22][23]. The proportion of caesarean deliveries is noticeably higher in Georgia (43.5% in 2016) [33] compared to the mean in European countries (25.2% in 2010) [42]. Considering this high rate, the negative association with early postpartum exclusive breastfeeding is of particular interest.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This finding is in accordance with other studies [9,[21][22][23]. The proportion of caesarean deliveries is noticeably higher in Georgia (43.5% in 2016) [33] compared to the mean in European countries (25.2% in 2010) [42]. Considering this high rate, the negative association with early postpartum exclusive breastfeeding is of particular interest.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…In the initial population, 30.8% of all births were emergency caesarean deliveries and 14.3% were elective caesarean deliveries (data not shown). In comparison, the median proportion of emergency caesarean deliveries was 12.9% and for elective caesarean deliveries 10.7% in an aggregated study of European countries [42]. Had reliable data been available, separating the caesarean deliveries into elective and emergency would be important, as it would allow the adjustment for related variables like in vitro fertilization, maternal intrapartum complications, and birthweight.…”
Section: Strengths and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Global elective CS rates vary considerably between different regions and countries. Routine data from the Euro-Peristat study show that the rate of elective CS ranges between 0.5% (Romania) and 38.8% (Cyprus) of total births [6]. Other countries with high elective CS rates include Italy (24.9%), Luxembourg (17.9%), and Malta (16.4%) [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mode of delivery is one of Euro-Peristat's core indicators and is compiled separately by risk sub-groups based on parity, plurality, fetal presentation, previous caesarean section and gestational age. 14 Caesarean birth rates are calculated as a proportion of all stillbirths and live births, following the convention of international organisations, such as WHO and the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. For the data collection exercise based on 2015 births, data about the TGCS were compiled using a pretested, standardised data collection table.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prelabour caesarean sections are those occurring before the onset of labour, but as some countries use a classification based on whether caesarean sections are elective or emergency, Euro-Peristat combines prelabour with elective caesarean sections and caesarean sections during labour with emergency caesarean sections. 14 All data were cross-checked for potential discrepancies with data on total numbers of births, total number of caesarean sections, multiple births, preterm births, parity compiled for other indicators and errors were corrected by the data providers. The final data tables were verified by each of the country teams.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%